Welcome back to Gavel and Gossip where diving back in to our discussion of the Justin Baldoni claims that were dismissed against Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane, and the NY Times concluding our discussion of the judge's reasoning for dismissing the defamation and false light claims.
In this explosive episode, we zero in on the exact legal logic used by the judge in the Dismissal Order. We'll break down the crucial balance the court struck between the First Amendment—the right to free speech—and the severe claims of defamation. We'll explain what the court identified as the statements Baldoni and the Wayfarer parties claimed were defamatory, allegedly made by Blake Lively, Ryan Reynolds, Leslie Sloane, and The New York Times. You'll hear precisely what they were fighting about. Finally, we go straight to the source, reading directly from the judge’s order, including the judge finding Baldoni and the Wayfarer parties basic fundamental failure to meet the requirements for stating facts in their legal complaint, and the powerful privileges that, in the eyes of the court, protected the defendants' statements—even if those statements were defamatory.
Join us as we react to this definitive legal conclusion and explain how the interplay of celebrity, claims of defamation, and free speech privileges sealed the fate of Baldoni's lawsuit!
The information provided in this podcast is for informational and entertainment purposes only. The content should not be construed as legal advice or any lawyer client relationship.The information is not a substitute for professional legal counsel. THESE ARE JUST OUR OPINIONS!!!
Reach out or follow us:
Instagram: @gavel_and_gossip
TikTok: @gavel.gossip
Leslie's Instagram and TikTok: @lesliecaesq
Kristan's Instagram: @krush18
