Enjoying the show? Support our mission and help keep the content coming by buying us a coffee.
The 9/11 Pentagon attack remains a flashpoint for conspiracy theories. This program dissects the structural myths of the 9/11 Truth movement, contrasting them with new bombshell intelligence that confirms significant government failures both before and after the attack.
Our mission is to help you separate unfounded, physics-defying claims from credible, documented evidence of intelligence failure and potential foreign government support.
The early visual anomalies that fueled the "missile" theory are thoroughly debunked by engineering science:
The ASCE Report: The 75 foot hole in the heavily reinforced Pentagon (Wedge 1) was not the plane's outline. The Boeing 757 hitting the structure at 530 mph essentially disintegrated, creating a blast radius zone of destruction.
The Landing Gear Fingerprint: The smaller, cleaner inner hole was created by the landing gear assembly—the densest, most robust part of the plane—acting like a projectile after the rest of the fuselage failed.
Intact Windows: Intact windows right above the impact zone were blast-resistant glass, designed to survive the jet fuel explosion and contain the pressure wave—not evidence of a hoax.
Conclusive Forensics: DNA analysis identified the remains of all 53 passengers and 6 crew members at the site, and investigators recovered the black boxes and major landing gear parts. A missile doesn't carry 59 people.
While the physical theories are refuted, the relentless 9/11 family litigation against Saudi Arabia has surfaced new evidence that validates the skepticism over intelligence failures:
The Target Surveillance: FBI agents seized a surveillance video from suspected Saudi agent Omar AlBayoumi (who provided indispensable logistical support to two of the hijackers). The video showed pre-operational surveillance of the U.S. Capitol Building (the likely target of Flight 93).
The Descent Calculation: Agents also seized a handwritten mathematical sketch that aerospace experts confirmed was the formula needed for a pilot to calculate the precise rate of descent for a low-altitude suicide impact.
The Institutional Breakdown: This critical, actionable intelligence was collected in 2001 but was buried in bureaucracy for over a decade, never reaching the 9/11 Commission or FBI agents working related cases. Bayoumi's evidence was slated for destruction until an agent intervened to save it.
The 9/11 truth movement is defined by three tiers of skepticism:
LIHOP (Let It Happen On Purpose): Officials had advance warning but deliberately stood down.
MIHOP (Made It Happen On Purpose): Elements within the government actively planned and executed the attacks (e.g., controlled demolition).
Others: Focused on perceived anomalies (like the Pentagon hole) and demanding a new investigation.
The Bayoumi evidence fundamentally validates the need for investigation into real governmental failures and potential foreign support, redirecting focus away from the non-credible physical claims.
Final Question: What specific, practical, non-bureaucratic mechanisms need to be embedded within the intelligence community today to ensure that highly specific, operational intelligence (like the Capitol surveillance video) gets immediately flagged, cross-referenced across agencies, and elevated to the highest levels?
