The academic article, "Red, Blue, and Purple Firms: Organizational Political Ideology and Corporate Social Responsibility," explores the relationship between a company's collective political beliefs and its engagement with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). The authors introduce the concept of organizational political ideology to explain why firms vary in their CSR stances, suggesting that the political leanings of the larger employee population, not just the CEO's, influence these corporate actions. Using employee political donations to define firms as "red" (conservative), "blue" (liberal), or "purple" (moderate), the study finds that liberal-leaning companies engage in more CSR advances across measures such as overall CSR profiles, female executive representation, and domestic partner benefits. Furthermore, the source asserts that this effect is stronger when industry norms for CSR are weak, the company has high human capital intensity, and the CEO has a long organizational tenure. This research contributes a novel, quantifiable measure of organizational ideology and offers a framework for understanding its impact on strategic decisions beyond CSR.
