Neste episódio, continuo conversando com o brilhante Dr. Franz Borges sobre pseudociências, Professor do Campus Centro do IFFluminense. Apresentamos mais três pseudociências: a astrologia, a psicanálise e as "terapias integrativas complementares".
Dicas e Referências:
Livros
Artigos
Gervais, W. M. (2015). Override the controversy: Analytic thinking predicts endorsement of evolution. Cognition, 142, 312–321.
Willard, A. K., & Norenzayan, A. (2013). Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life’s purpose. Cognition, 129(2), 379–391
Brian A. Zaboski & David J. Therriault (2019): Faking science: scientificness, credibility, and belief in pseudoscience, Educational Psychology
Doehring C., Sundrum A. (2016). Efficacy of homeopathy in livestock according to peer-reviewed publications from 1981 to 2014. Veterinary Record. 1-13.
Robert T. Mathie, Nitish Ramparsad, Lynn A. Legg, Jürgen Clausen, Sian Moss, Jonathan R. T. Davidson, Claudia-Martina Messow, Alex McConnachie (2016). Randomised, double-blind, placebocontrolled trials of non-individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic Reviews, 6:63
Suitbert, E., Geoffrey, D. (1996). Are personality differences between twins predicted by astrology? Personality and Individual Differences. Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 449-454
Carlson, S. (1985). A double-blind test of astrology. Nature 318, 419–425. - Hudson, A., Blake, K., McLaughlin, R. (2016). Amber jewellery: A dangerous popular trend for toddlers during their teething months and beyond. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 470-472.
Arte da Capa - Dara Alves
