This essay explores the fundamental differences between liberalism and conservatism, emphasizing their roots in political philosophy and their relationship with power, property, and morality. The author argues that politics is inherently about managing property and that without the ability to expropriate property, liberalism would be meaningless. Liberalism relies on the expropriation of property, which is legitimized through political means, often leading to tyranny.
Conversely, conservatism is portrayed as inherently aligned with producing wealth and creating property. Conservatives are depicted as naturally uncomfortable with politics because their focus is on the free market and economic principles, which are seen as incompatible with political engagement. The essay suggests that conservatives are the heirs of the church, with a natural inclination toward Christianity and its moral teachings.
The term conservatism arose when the church failed to uphold its social contract, and conservatism is seen as an attempt to bring the church back to its foundational principles. The essay concludes that conservatism is about overcoming sin and fighting principalities and powers, rather than tolerating them or adjusting to them.
