Look for any podcast host, guest or anyone

Listen

Description

Don’t Drive Off a Cliff, It May Not Be Covered  


https://zalma.com/blog


Jimmy wanted a new pickup truck in the worst way. He decided to  deliberately wreck his old car, make a claim against his insurance  policy and use the proceeds to buy a new F150.  Jimmy disclosed his plan to his best friend, Winifred. She agreed to  help — as a lookout for oncoming traffic —on the night they chose to  destroy the car.  Jimmy, with his friend Winifred as a passenger, intentionally drove his  pickup off the road and over a small cliff at 35 mph. He did not let her  out of the truck to be his “look out” as planned. He thought it would  be more realistic a claim — one that would not be questioned by his  insurance company, if  Winifred was in the car with him.  As planned, the car did not survive the crash. Unfortunately, neither  did Winifred.  The heirs argued they were entitled to Under Insured Motorists (UIM)  benefits under the Farmers and County Mutual policy because Jimmy was  under insured. Furthermore, they claimed Winifred’s death was  “accidental.”  


Farmers and County Mutual’s response was, translated from the lawyerese:  “Give us a break.”  The heirs argued that Jimmy and Winifred intended to destroy the truck,  not Winifred. The death was accidental.  In the Winifred’s Heirs v. Farmers & County Mutual arbitration,  Farmers and County argued that interpretation of “accident” in liability  policies is hyper-technical and legalistic and should not apply to the  same term in UIM policies. The arbitrator ruled in favor of the insurer.  The heirs sued, lost at the trial court, that adopted the ruling of the  Arbitrator. The heirs appealed and a Court of Appeals agreed, saying  that, for UIM purposes, an “accident” is an “event” that, from the  insured’s and the underinsured motorist’s perspective, is “unforeseen,  unintended unexpected or the like.”  An injury is not accidental, the appellate court explained, if the  injury-producing event was intended or expected. It is not necessary  that the insured intend or expect the injury.  


People who do wrong should not profit from it. Paying Winifred’s heirs  for her death while admitting that she was intentionally a part of a  criminal act is the same as the police paying the heirs of an armed  robber who is shot to death by the police in the course of his armed  robbery.


Every person who buys insurance should shout to their insurers – GIVE US  A BREAK!  (c) 2022 Barry Zalma & ClaimSchool, Inc.  Barry Zalma, Esq., CFE, now limits his practice to service as an  insurance consultant specializing in insurance coverage, insurance  claims handling, insurance bad faith and insurance fraud almost equally  for insurers and policyholders. He practiced law in California for more  than 44 years as an insurance coverage and claims handling lawyer and  more than 54 years in the insurance business. He is available at http://www.zalma.com and zalma@zalma.com.  Subscribe to Zalma on Insurance at locals.com https://zalmaoninsurance.local.com/subscribe.  Subscribe to Excellence in Claims Handling at https://barryzalma.substack.com/welcome.