Listen

Description

The topics we discuss in this episode include:

-Brendan’s journey to studying combat decision-making

-The difference between what you learn in the classroom and how things really are in the fleet

-Brendan's “sabbatical” in 29 Palms

-Preparing young officers to lead platoons

-The challenge of maintaining a fighting edge with your unit while deployed

-The dangers of over-formalizing and over-standardizing training

-The role of trust in the Marine Corps and how training increases it in a unit

-The importance of humility for leaders

-The role of the personnel system in a fighting organization

-The role of processes, policies, and people who don’t add value to an organization

-Brendan’s thoughts on General David H. Berger’s force design plans for the Marine Corps

-Brendan’s take on the competency of our elected officials on defense matters and how well the services do on advising those officials

-How well the Marine Corps teaches decision-making

-What techniques Brendan found most effective in teaching decision-making

-Where Brendan found inspiration for his own PME

-The need for consistency in a PME unit program and making PME a norm in a unit

-The genesis of Brendan’s excellent website: http://www.2ndbn5thmar.com

Links

Brendan’s Infantry Skills Training website: http://www.2ndbn5thmar.com

"I Want to be ‘Ender’” by Brendan McBreen: http://www.2ndbn5thmar.com/dm/EnderMcBreen1998.pdf

Eratta

Regarding the Charles Whitman decision-forcing case, I misquoted the referenced poll percentage. The poll claims that around 36% of Americans were against the Vietnam War in August 1966, when Whitman went on his rampage.