In the age of Digital Reproduction, what meaning does the architectural image now hold? As one significant arm of architectural representation, has its apparent form and content trans-mutated over time for both its producers and its consumers?
The architectural photograph has often been accused of the neutron bomb affect, yet this is not outside of its own context, as well as the context which it hopes to capture. Does it frame and form its object, as before, when the very act of controlling this has changed over time? Does every new instance of it enter into a dialogue with versions that have been deemed iconic?
In a world, where the digital eye, has increasingly become the mediator of all our experiences, how do we begin to approach, dissect, and disseminate an image?
