Christopher discusses recent examples of ontological arguments backpedalled by both the catholic and protestant churches, revealing how man made the ideas of, for example, limbo and hellfire are.
He then calls out the catholic church’s cyclic behaviour to apologise to the world and then reclaim infallibility all over again.
He explains and defines widely, what an atheist is, and that we make no knowledge claim at all, we simply refute the theist claim.
Hitchens then clarifies the difference between deists explaining the world via a designer and theists explaining the world with a designer that answers prayers and more.
Hitchens then claims that we don’t need a supervisor to be moral beings and that we find too many vicious immoral acts from humanity that are performed by those who believe they have divine permission.
Finishes with the Hitchens challenge on morality against the religious and addresses the argument for fine tuning and the wanton craving for a totalitarian situation of the human condition.
