In this reflective piece, the author examines the intellectual necessity of being wrong as a vital component of personal and philosophical growth. They argue that while individuals naturally believe their current views are correct, maintaining an openness to feedback and interdisciplinary research is essential for refining one's perspective. The text highlights how ontological frameworks—the foundational lenses through which we see the world—often cause disagreements between people who simply hold different core assumptions. By tracing their own shift from Economic Realism to a unique "Mediated Encounter" theory, the author demonstrates that abandoning flawed ideas is a sign of progress rather than failure. Ultimately, the essay serves as an invitation for constructive criticism, suggesting that identifying the "asterisks" or holes in a theory is the only way to evolve. Through this lens, the writer rejects rigid political and academic categories, advocating instead for a dynamic and humble approach to seeking truth.
