In this philosophical essay, Bry Willis argues that truth becomes an exhausted concept once we move past traditional metaphysical theories. The author presents a central two-horn dilemma where truth is either stabilised as a trivial administrative tool or remains substantive but inherently contestable. By examining domains such as morality, science, and history, the text demonstrates that truth cannot act as a neutral adjudicator between different frameworks without relying on circular reasoning. Willis suggests that while truth-talk remains linguistically indispensable, it lacks the structural depth to perform the heavy philosophical lifting often expected of it. Ultimately, the work reframes persistent debates as a predictable outcome of deflationary constraints rather than unresolved mysteries. This structural diagnosis concludes that we must accept truth as a procedural necessity rather than an ontological foundation.👉 https://philosophics.blog/2026/01/28/truth-after-deflation-why-truth-refuses-to-behave/
