Giving the benefit of the doubt to Tether is the same as making allegations that they are printing usdt for a direct note.
Both sides are speculating or making 'allegations.'
Why is one side considered making allegations and the other not? Both sides do not know because they are not Tether insiders.
Until Tether proves they have received real dollars in way that satisfies its critics, then its critics have an analyst duty to make allegations.
Why trust them and give them the benefit of the doubt. These people who defend Tether are making assumptions as well.
----------
Notes after the recording-
Found this tweet-
"There is absolutely no way to validate this based on an attestation. It's not about, if the reserves are there (attestation), it's HOW the reserves got there (audit) that makes all the difference."
https://twitter.com/bccponzi/status/1425033038782779427
