In today’s episode Carolina and Clara discuss free will vs determinism in a philosophical, physics and neuroscience context! Can the philosophical debate be reduced to the sciences? Does the existence of chance and randomness invalidate determinism? Does spontaneous brain activity support free will?
“Further conceive, I beg, that a stone, while continuing in motion, should be capable of thinking and knowing, that it is endeavoring, as far as it can, to continue to move. Such a stone, being conscious merely of its own endeavor and not at all indifferent, would believe itself to be completely free, and would think that it continued in motion solely because of its own wish. This is that human freedom, which all boast that they possess, and which consists solely in the fact, that men are conscious of their own desire, but are ignorant of the causes whereby that desire has been determined.” Spinoza
---
We hope you enjoy the episode! Please feel free to share with your friends and family, it means a lot to us🤍
Neuroverse Website
https://neuroversepod.com
Podcast directory
https://anchor.fm/neuroverse9
Support us!
https://ko-fi.com/neuroverse
Twitter: @neuroverse_pod
https://twitter.com/neuroverse_pod?s=21&t=KvAEuwGNKFQ9IPKlL7NTEg
Instagram: @Neuroverse_pod
https://instagram.com/neuroverse_pod?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
Help us improve our podcast by giving us some feedback!
