How is that some leaders would earn the title of being influential but the outcomes of their leadership is one to be desired whereas the other leader, is everything one would want to emulate?
In this episode I discuss the tales of two leaders: Martin Luther King Jr. and Jim Jones. The two leaders would be considered influential in their own ways, yet the outcome from their leadership, even though having profound impact in different ways, are outcomes that are looked upon in different ways.
What is it about them?
That's what you'll discover as you listen to this episode.
Please encourage others to listen and please share. Leave your comments on the show and show me some love here by "clapping" using the inbuilt mechanism to do so.
Thanks in advance.
