Description

In this episode, I explain to Dasha why and how health research findings are often false. This episode was recorded for the lay person's understanding.

There is no midwifery advice by podcast. Understanding research misconduct can be a vital step towards taking control of your health. Having health care providers and those seeking care understand research misconduct will bring change to public heath.

People who are speaking of these issues are:

- Marcia Angell Former Editor in chief NEJM

- Richard Horton Editor of the Lancet

- Peter Wilmshurst, cardiologist, researcher and investigator of research misconduct https://committees.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/106767/pdf/

- Aseem Malhotra, cardiologist https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UDXOArxFAGQ 

____________________Stay connected, subscribe or follow me

On instagram: @lyanne.pinto

On spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/1VExN1mFc5dYVk8h1Lddfb

On Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/from-the-heart/id1729268533

On Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@LyannePinto/videos

All links: https://linktr.ee/lyannepinto

Support Lyanne's Offerings: If you find value in these talks and wish to support their continuation, please consider making a donation. Your generosity helps keep these teachings available to all. Any amount is immensely appreciated. https://paypal.me/LyannePinto

_____________________

Resources and references:

How to read and understand research:

https://chriskresser.com/how-to-read-and-understand-scientific-research/

Why most research findings are false? https://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Helping physicians and patients understand statistics

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2008.00033.x?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed#bibr103-j-1539-6053-2008-00033-x

Misleading communication of risks

https://library.mpib-berlin.mpg.de/ft/gg/GG_Misleading_2010.pdf

Mismatched framing in medical journals

Sedrakyan A, Shih C. Improving depiction of benefits and harms:analyses of studies of well-known therapeutics and review of highimpact medical journals. Med Care 2007;45:523-8.

Crime pays: pharmaceuticals

https://www.bmj.com/content/345/bmj.e8462.full

Whistle blower law

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=riVZy8Tfal8

and

Are Whistle blowing Laws Working? A global study of whistleblower protection litigation 2021

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292006571_Improving_depiction_of_benefits_and_harms_-_Analyses_of_studies_of_well-known_therapeutics_and_review_of_high-impact_medical_journals

Cardiology researcher:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/larryhusten/2011/11/17/prominent-dutch-cardiovascular-researcher-fired-for-scientific-misconduct/?sh=6c6b4a2f5996 

Studies I make reference to:

https://www.jsad.com/doi/10.15288/jsad.2016.77.185

Canola oil study funded by profiters:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23731447/

Study on polyunsaturated fatty acids funded by taxes

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006295208007776?via%3Dihub

Induction of labour

- ARRIVE trial (funded by pharmaceutical industry)

- Hannah Dalhen, midwifery researcher: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUEOy76j3xM

- AIHW. Australian mothers and babies 2018. perinatal statistics series, 2020. (national data)