'Should Artists Be Paid for Social Dancing?
The Service vs. Obligation Debate'
This episode tackles a persistent and controversial question: Should artists be explicitly paid for social dancing? Gui and I explore the fundamental disconnect between what dance professionals are paid for (classes) and what they are often implicitly expected to deliver (hours of social dancing).
The Problem: Obligation vs. Desire
We clarify that this is a complex issue with historical roots, citing examples like "contract dancers" in Brazil and "token socials" (Baile de Ficha) where dancers are paid per song.
The Artist's Perspective: A traveling artist might be away for five days but only be explicitly paid for four hours of teaching. The expectation to social dance becomes an unpaid obligation that leads to fatigue and, often, resentment. Many artists supplement their festival income by teaching private lessons, making their "free time" a critical part of their livelihood.
The Attendee's Perspective: Many attendees view dancing with a featured artist as a key—if not the primary—reason for attending an event. When they don't get a dance, or see a visibly tired artist, they feel their expectations haven't been met.
Finding Clarity and Solutions
We argue that the current system is simplified and unhealthy. Instead of debating whether paying for social dancing is "right" or "wrong," we should focus on providing clarity and structure to benefit all parties:
Explicit Contracts: Organizers should clarify social dancing expectations in the contract, explicitly stating the hours an artist is expected to be present at the social.
Alternative Compensation Models: We discuss models like a designated "Power Hour" or "Teacher Hour" where attendees know they can find all artists, managing expectations for the rest of the night.
Community Benefit Models: We propose models where a "token" fee for a dance goes to charity or to subsidize passes for people in the community, transforming the transaction into an act of community contribution rather than a "cash grab."
Acknowledge the True Demand: Gui suggests that if social dancing is the main draw for an event, organizers should consider structuring it as a "mini-marathon" where the artists are explicitly paid for the social dancing service, instead of disguising it as teaching.
Ultimately, the lack of clarity and the implicit "shoulds" (e.g., "Teachers should be on the floor") create pressure and disappointment. We believe more agreements and clear communication will improve the experience for both artists and attendees.
_____________
Do you think setting a paid "Teacher Hour" is a viable way to manage social dancing expectations at a festival? Share your thoughts and join the conversation!
