Welcome to Revise and Resubmit, the podcast where we dig deep into groundbreaking research and take a closer look at how it changes the way we see the world. Today, we’re exploring an eye-opening study that asks a critical question—“Do Women Receive Worse Financial Advice?” Published in The Journal of Finance, this paper by Utpal Bhattacharya, Amit Kumar, Sujata Visaria, and Jing Zhao takes a hard look at gender discrimination in the financial advisory world.
Picture this: trained undercover men and women, posing as potential clients, visit 65 financial advisory firms in Hong Kong. What do they discover? At financial planning firms, women are more likely than men to receive suboptimal advice—advised to buy only local or individual securities. And here's the kicker: even when female clients show confidence, risk tolerance, or a domestic outlook, the advice still falls short. The study explains this troubling pattern as statistical discrimination driven by the advisors’ incentives, not just personal bias. But why does this happen, and how can it change?
The implications here are huge—not just for women seeking financial independence but for the entire financial industry. So, is it time for financial advisors to reevaluate their methods, or are these biases too deeply rooted to change?
Before we dive in, let’s give our thanks to the authors—Utpal Bhattacharya, Amit Kumar, Sujata Visaria, and Jing Zhao—and the Journal of Finance for publishing such an essential study. Now, here’s the question—how can we ensure financial advice is equally valuable for everyone, regardless of gender?
Let’s explore that together.
Reference
Bhattacharya, U., Kumar, A., Visaria, S., & Zhao, J. (2024). Do women receive worse financial advice?. The Journal of Finance, 79(5). https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13366
