Welcome to Revise and Resubmit, where we explore cutting-edge research that shapes the business world. Today, we’re excited to discuss a fascinating paper published in Research Policy, a prestigious FT50 journal known for groundbreaking work in strategic leadership and radical innovation. The study, titled More Risk-Averse or More Innovative? The Effect of Women Board Membership and Aspirations on Patent Activity, is authored by Stephen J. Smulowitz, Małgorzata Smulowitz, and Didier Cossin.
This research digs deep into the relationship between gender diversity on corporate boards and firm innovation, challenging conventional theories. Drawing on the Behavioral Theory of the Firm (BTOF), the authors ask: Do women directors steer firms toward cautious survival or bold innovation? The answer, as it turns out, depends on context. When companies struggle to meet their aspirations, boards with more women tend to focus on survival, slowing down innovation. But when firms outperform expectations, that same diversity fuels daring, forward-thinking decisions, leading to a surge in innovation—especially in high-impact patents.
Before we dive deeper into the data and insights, let’s extend our thanks to Stephen J. Smulowitz, Małgorzata Smulowitz, Didier Cossin, and Elsevier for sharing this vital research with the world.
Here’s the question that lingers: Can balancing gender diversity and strategic aspirations unlock the perfect blend of risk-taking and innovation?
Reference
Smulowitz, S. J., Smulowitz, M., & Cossin, D. (2025). More risk-averse or more innovative? The effect of women board membership and aspirations on patent activity. Research Policy, 54(1), 105109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105109
