A few weeks ago I argued that the Constitution was "neutral" on slavery. This didn't sit well with leftist libertarians who contend the document was pro-slavery. James Oaks has written a new book that contends the Constitution was anti-slavery. Are either correct? And what does this mean for America? I discuss in this episode of The Brion McClanahan Show.
https://mcclanahanacademy.com
https://brionmcclanahan.com/support
http://learntruehistory.com
