A study published in Nature shows that algorithmically generated poetry is indistinguishable from human-written poetry and even receives higher ratings. This finding contradicts previous research and sparks debate about the nature of creativity and artistic merit.
Commenters on Enrique Dans' blog express varied opinions, some arguing that AI merely mimics existing works while others highlight AI's potential to surpass human capabilities in certain aspects of poetry creation.
The discussion underscores the subjective nature of artistic judgment and the implications of advanced AI for creative fields. Ultimately, the core question remains: can AI truly create art, or is it merely a sophisticated tool?
This article is also available in English on my Medium page, «What rhymes with algorithm?»
