In episode 112, we’re talking about why you keep revisiting decisions you’ve already made, and how that habit is quietly slowing you down.
This episode isn’t about being “indecisive” or unclear. It’s about what happens when decisions don’t have boundaries. You narrow your options, choose a direction, and then start reopening old paths, renegotiating with yourself, and questioning progress instead of building on it.
I walk through real client examples, from career pivots to business decisions, where circling back felt safer than committing forward. We break down why ambiguity can feel protective, how too many open paths drain momentum, and what it actually takes to move forward without burning everything down.
In this episode, I cover:
Why revisiting already-made decisions keeps you stuck
How decision-making without boundaries erodes self-trust
The hidden cost of keeping multiple paths “just in case”
Why circling feels safer than committing and why it slows growth
A simple framework to choose one active lane, test it, and review with data
Key Takeaways:
Circling isn’t confusion, it’s commitment without boundaries
Progress requires choosing one path long enough to gather real data
Keeping all options open feels safe, but costs clarity and momentum
Boundaries and timelines create trust in your decision-making
You don’t need certainty, just a contained commitment and review point
Chapters:
00:00 Why People Return to Previous Career Options
04:25 Identifying Reopened Decisions and Their Cost
07:17 The One-Lane Testing Framework for Career Paths
10:11 Using Data and Boundaries to Break the Cycle
Learn more and stay connected:
