The Supreme Court's decision in Tolan v. Cotton reversed a lower court ruling granting qualified immunity to a police officer who shot a suspect. The core issue was the lower court's improper consideration of facts, favoring the officer's account over the plaintiff's version of events during a summary judgment review. The Supreme Court emphasized that in such cases, facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. This ruling clarifies the procedure for evaluating qualified immunity claims but does not alter the underlying legal standards for excessive force. The case centers on a misunderstanding involving a seemingly stolen vehicle, escalating to an officer shooting the plaintiff after his mother's interaction with police
