Description

Send us a text

🎯 Why Listen:

A candid conversation on whether non-compete clauses in physician contracts harm doctors, patients, and the healthcare system — and what real reform might look like.

Co-Hosts:

• Dutch Rojas - Private Healthcare Advocate
• Anthony DiGiorgio, DO, MHA – Neurosurgeon, UCSF; health policy researcher.
• Anish Koka, MD – Private practice cardiologist, Philadelphia; healthcare policy commentator.
• Dan Choi, MD, FAAOS – Orthopedic spine surgeon, Long Island; healthcare advocate and social media voice.
• Sanat Dixit, MD, FACS 

Episode Overview:

Dutch and Anthony tackle the controversial topic of non-compete clauses in physician contracts — exploring their history, how they affect patient access, and whether proposed bans could change the landscape for both independent and employed doctors. Along the way, they discuss the unintended consequences of eliminating non-competes, the corporate pushback against reform, and what a balanced solution might look like.

Notable Quotes:

• “When a hospital locks down a doctor with a non-compete, they’re really locking down the patients.” – Anthony DiGiorgio
• “If we want more competition in healthcare, we can’t keep building fences around physicians.” – Dutch Rojas

The Episode:

00:00 – Welcome & Introduction

01:10 – What Are Non-Competes?

03:45 – The History Behind Physician Non-Competes

07:20 – How Non-Competes Limit Patient Access

10:40 – The FTC’s Proposed Ban & Pushback

15:05 – Hospital Arguments for Keeping Non-Competes

19:15 – Potential Unintended Consequences

24:00 – Case Studies: When Non-Competes Hurt Communities

29:30 – Alternatives to Non-Competes

34:50 – What Real Reform Could Look Like

38:10 – Closing Thoughts

🔗 Connect with the Hosts:

• Dutch Rojas on X

• Dr. Anthony DiGiorgio on X

• Dr. Anish Koka on X

• Dr. Dan Choi on X

• Dr. Sanat Dixit on X