You don't actually need to hire three people. You probably need to stop thinking in extremes first.
This week, a listener asked the question, "I need an EA, an ops person, and someone for client delivery -- but I only have the budget for one. Who do I hire first?"
The answer is not who. It's what. And it's probably sooner and smaller than you think.
Adrienne and Emily break down how to actually make this decision, why most people wait too long to hire anyone, and what to do if you can't afford a full-time person but genuinely can't keep doing everything yourself.
What they cover:
Submit a Dear Bossy question or listener question: sortabossypodcast.com
Follow Adrienne on Instagram
⏱️ Time Chapters
00:01 Welcome and banter
09:33 Today's question: EA, ops, or delivery -- who do you hire first when you can only afford one?
10:02 Why one size fits all doesn't work here
11:21 Stop living in all-or-nothings: you don't need a full-time person to start
12:15 The gig economy makes smaller, sooner hiring more accessible than ever
13:35 It might not be three people -- it might be one person with overlapping strengths
16:10 The only two ways a hire actually generates ROI
17:59 Track your time first -- you cannot make this decision without the data
18:57 Delivery vs. EA: which one actually opens up revenue capacity?
19:26 Delegation is a muscle. Start with the five pound weights
21:04 Hire for what drains you most, not just what takes the most time
22:19 AI agents are not a workaround if you can't delegate clearly to begin with
23:45 How to figure out what to automate vs. what actually needs a human
24:41 The time tracking case -- know exactly how many hours you need before you hire
25:34 Final thoughts: start smaller, start sooner, and use your freed-up time intentionally