Listen

Description

Introduction

The Current problem - many different positions

* Usury is rent on money

* Usury not present today

* Thomas Woods - doctrine has implicit assumptions - https://archive.org/details/churchmarketcath0000wood

* Destroys all moral doctrine

* Thomas Divine, SJ - merely oppression of the poor, objective market rates prevent oppression of the poor - https://archive.org/details/interesthistoric0000thom

* Doesn't account for consistent condemnation of usury against wealthy

* Both fail to realize time preference as an excuse for usury was condemned by Innocent XI - https://archive.org/details/sourcesofcatholi00denz/page/326/mode/2up?q=innocent+xi&view=theater

* Attempts to reconcile modern economics with usury doctrine

* Brian McCall - takes up Belloc's position - https://angeluspress.org/products/church-and-usurers

* Confuses ancient argument of consumption of lent good, with consumption of good bought with lent money

* Dr. Storck - Tries to give extrinsic titles some teeth - https://thejosias.com/2017/06/05/usury/

* Still thinks savings accounts may be usurious

* Usury is nearly everywhere in modern economies

* Heinrich Pesch - the "general" sin of usury is taking any surplus value in a business transaction - https://archive.org/details/heinrichpeschons0000pesc

* Some people have called this the position that capitalism is "usury-ism"

* Typcially take this from canon law, where usury is very vaguely and generally condmened

* Any interest on any loan is usury

* Others

* Usury depends on the nature of money

* Nature of money has changed and become rentable capital

* Nature of money hasn't changed and loans of money are either always or generally usurious

Previous discussion

* Mutuum is central to the definition

* Mutuum is there contract where usury arises

Aquinas leads the way

* De Malo q. 13, a. 4, ad. 15

* When good is given such that it may be consumed -> usury

* When good is given otherwise, we have other considerations

* Sale

* Immediate transfer of full ownership

* Commodatum and Locatio

* Grant of the use of a thing for a time

* Commodatum - gratuitous loan, think grant of books at a library

* Locatio - lease of a good for a rental

* Census and leaseback

* Grant of ownership apart from the use

* The seller retains the use of the thing for a time and may pay rent for that use

* Mutuum

* Lender grants the use such that borrower may consume it

* This entails that the lender transfer the whole ownership

* This means that the lender does not hold a usufruct from which to charge some rent

* Usury then is attempt to sell what does not exist, namely the usufruct which the lender does not hold

* Aquinas dicussion that usury is the price of the use of money

* Discusses in a few places the absence of a usufruct

Evils of Usury

* A sort of theft

*  takes what does not belong or is not owed to the lender

* A sort of slavery

* Since the lender has no claim except against the person of the borrower, the usurer claims he can rent the person of the borrower.

* Means that the mutuum is fundamentally an act of charity

* Not for profit, but out of love of a friend in need



This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit lendhopingnothing.substack.com