"Quiet quitting" can be interpreted as putting in the minimum effort required of us in the workplace in an attempt to foster work-life balance. Why won't this work for Scientists, and is this a sign of systemic toxicity?
In Episode #022 I explore Steven Bartlett's Quitting framework, compare the difference between quiet vs loud quitting, and interpret 8 red flags of a toxic workplace through the lens of a scientist. It turns out that our threshold for punishing work conditions is higher than most, and this benefits and harms scientists in equal measure.
Chapters
* (0:00) Introduction
* (1:01) Steven Bartlett's Quitting Framework
* (4:34) Science is defined by failure
* (8:18) Quiet quitting vs loud quitting
* (13:05) 3 signs your boss is considering a "quiet cut"
* (15:57) 8 red flags of a toxic work environment
Show Notes:
* Steven Bartlett's Quitting Framework
* 3 millennials try to explain quiet quitting
* Is loud quitting worse than quiet quitting?
* 8 Red flags of toxic workplaces
* The Happiest Job in the world?
Thanks for reading BioLab Collective with Jack Wang! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
