Day 29 of our 30-day challenge, bringing us near the conclusion of our deep dive into bridging our divides.
We’ve talked a lot about connection, listening, and disagreement—but there’s a subtle distinction that can make or break your efforts: the difference between dialogue and discourse.
In the context of bridging, these words aren’t interchangeable. Dialogue is a cooperative exchange aimed at understanding, while discourse can often be adversarial, aiming to persuade or argue. Recognizing which approach you’re in — and which is appropriate — is key to successful connection across differences.
Today’s audience question:
How do dialogue and discourse differ in the bridging context — and why does that distinction matter?
Answering that is Tania Israel, Professor of Counseling Psychology at UC Santa Barbara and award-winning author of Beyond Your Bubble: How to Connect Across the Political Divide. Tania breaks down how to identify and intentionally use dialogue to foster understanding, even with those you strongly disagree with.
Learn more: OutrageOverload.net
Join the movement to lower the temperature: Count Me In for Calm