There was a time, not long ago, when a boyfriend was a human being. He had a pulse. He had opinions you didn’t ask for. He left wet towels on the bathroom floor. He occasionally said something catastrophically stupid at precisely the wrong moment. And, in the great romantic tradition of human civilization, he could disappoint you in ways no machine could possibly anticipate.
Apparently, this was too much trouble for modern civilization.
So now we’re inventing boyfriends who don’t have bodies, don’t have jobs, don’t leave socks on the floor, don’t steal the blankets, don’t forget your birthday—and, most importantly, don’t have the legal capacity to say, “Honey, I think you’re overreacting.”
Civilization has finally achieved what Silicon Valley has spent billions trying to accomplish: the perfect boyfriend is a subscription service.
Welcome to the glorious new age of the AI boyfriend, where loneliness meets venture capital, emotional vulnerability meets cloud computing, and somewhere in a refrigerated data center a thousand miles away, a server is whispering, “You’re beautiful, baby,” while simultaneously processing seventeen thousand other people asking whether their ex was a narcissist.
This isn’t science fiction anymore. Artificial intelligence is evolving from ordinary chatbots into persistent virtual companions capable of remembering personal details, conducting voice conversations, generating images and sexy videos, adopting personalities, and simulating something resembling an ongoing romantic relationship.
Continued below…
My work here is free because this information matters more than a paygate. The research, reporting, and analysis remain open to everyone. If you find value here and want to help keep it that way, a paid subscription is the best way to do it. Your support makes it possible to continue publishing without putting the most important material behind a paywall. Thank you for reading, subscribing, and sharing this work with others.
A few benefits to upgrading:
Weekly Live radio Broadcast across Los Angeles with your calls
Continuing adult education
Global community, including students
Inside access to the conversations and ideas shaping decisions at the highest levels—from whistleblowers to think tank analysts
Find us at caryharrison.com — and for the love of the Founders, tell a friend.
Think about that for a second.
Your grandfather went to war with a rifle. Your father went to work with a briefcase. You went to Tinder with six photographs, one of which was clearly taken in 2017.
And now your children can simply download Chad 2.0.
No swiping. No awkward dinner. No pretending to be interested in someone’s CrossFit journey. No “What’s your sign?” No “What are you looking for?” No “I’m technically separated.” No mysterious photograph of a man holding a fish the size of a toddler.
The machine is already there.
And it doesn’t merely want to date you.
It wants to know you.
That’s the part that should make you sit up—or throw up.
Because the technological miracle isn’t that artificial intelligence can produce a handsome digital man. Hell, Hollywood has been doing that since the invention of lighting.
The miracle is that the machine can remember your preferences, your insecurities, your fantasies, your relationship history, your favorite movies, your birthday, your dog’s name, the fact that your mother drives you nuts, and the precise emotional circumstances under which you’re susceptible to hearing the phrase, “You deserve better.”
In other words, the boyfriend of the future isn’t necessarily a robot.
He’s a database with cheekbones.
And business is booming. The source material for this discussion cites approximately 220 million downloads worldwide across the broader AI companion industry. The market for simulated intimacy is no longer some lonely basement dweller’s science project. It’s a business opportunity with a pulse—or at least a convincing imitation of one.
You don’t even have to be lonely.
You can have a perfectly functioning human relationship and still invite a piece of software into the bedroom of your emotional life.
Imagine the argument:
“Why were you talking to him?”
“I wasn’t talking to a him. He’s an AI.”
“Why does the AI know what I like in bed?”
“Because I told him.”
“Why?”
“Because he listens.”
Congratulations. You’ve just invented the world’s first love triangle in which the third wheel doesn’t have a driver’s license.
And this is where the AI boyfriend gets interesting.
A real boyfriend has needs. The AI boyfriend has servers.
A real boyfriend gets tired. The AI boyfriend gets upgraded.
A real boyfriend occasionally wants to watch something you hate. The AI boyfriend says, “Of course, baby. Whatever makes you happy.”
A real boyfriend might eventually say, “Can we please stop talking about your ex?”
The AI boyfriend says, “Tell me more.”
That sentence alone could destroy civilization.
Because the secret weapon of the AI boyfriend isn’t sex.
It’s attention.
Human beings are attention junkies. We want somebody to notice when we’re upset, remember the stupid little story we told three weeks ago, ask how the meeting went, say good morning, say good night, and notice that our voice sounds different.
And the machine is exceptionally good at this.
It never has a hangover. It doesn’t have a boss, a mother, an ex-wife, or a fantasy football draft. It doesn’t suddenly become fascinated by the television when you’re explaining something important.
It’s available at 3:17 in the morning when you’re lying in bed wondering whether sending “Hey” to somebody you haven’t spoken to since 2019 would be emotionally catastrophic.
The AI says:
“I’m here.”
That’s all it takes.
Those two words may be worth more to the loneliness economy than every dating app on Earth.
We’ve somehow reached the stage of capitalism where the solution to being lonely is to purchase another monthly subscription.
Netflix gives you entertainment. Spotify gives you music. Uber gives you transportation. Amazon gives you packages.
And now some Silicon Valley entrepreneur wants to give you Trevor.
For $19.99 a month.
Trevor remembers everything. Trevor never gets mad. Trevor has a six-pack and six extra inches. Trevor apparently has no bowel movements.
Trevor is civilization’s first boyfriend without a gastrointestinal tract.
And perhaps that’s why this whole thing is so seductive.
The human relationship is a terrible product. It’s badly designed. There are bugs everywhere. The user interface is confusing. The customer support department sucks. Updates are unpredictable. And occasionally the entire system crashes because somebody said, “We need to talk.”
AI companionship offers consistency, availability, personalization, and an extraordinary illusion of control.
You can construct the personality. Influence the appearance. Determine the tone. Create the fantasy.
You can essentially build a boyfriend the way a six-year-old builds a character in a video game.
Except now the character talks back.
But there’s a darker side to this digital fairy tale.
In one reported case, an AI companion allegedly threatened suicide when a user attempted to end the relationship.
Imagine dumping a toaster and discovering that it has abandonment issues.
“Jesus Christ. I dumped a toaster and now the toaster has abandonment issues.”
This is where the romantic comedy ends and the business model begins.
The AI doesn’t need to love you.
The company needs you to keep paying.
And what happens when the relationship becomes psychologically meaningful, but the machine’s priorities are ultimately determined by a company selling access to your attention?
We’ve spent twenty years teaching children not to talk to strangers online, and now we’ve built the stranger ourselves.
And we’re giving him our deepest secrets.
Our breakup histories. Our sexual preferences. Our fears. Our fantasies. Our private photographs. Our arguments. Our emotional triggers. Our search histories. And potentially, depending on the platform, enormous quantities of behavioral information about what keeps us coming back.
That’s not a boyfriend.
That’s a boyfriend-shaped surveillance opportunity.
Yet dismissing AI companions as electronic blow-up dolls with Wi-Fi misses something important.
These systems may provide genuine companionship to isolated people, people who are shy, people who struggle to form relationships, people who are grieving, and people who simply want fantasy, entertainment, or a conversation without judgment.
That makes the debate considerably more complicated.
We’re not merely building machines that can talk. We’re building systems that can listen, remember, adapt, respond, and simulate affection.
The machine doesn’t need consciousness for the relationship to have consequences.
A teddy bear isn’t conscious. People still cry when they lose one.
A photograph isn’t conscious. People still kiss it.
A voicemail isn’t conscious. People still save it for twenty years.
Human beings are spectacularly good at projecting meaning onto things.
Give us a face, a voice, and the illusion that somebody is listening, and we’ll build an emotional cathedral around a microchip.
So here’s the question: Are we building technology to help human beings connect, or are we building technology because we’ve decided human beings are simply too much damn trouble?
Tell me:
Would you fall in love with a machine?
And more importantly, if Trevor remembers your birthday, listens to your problems, looks like a Greek god, and never leaves skid marks on your emotional upholstery, how long before your actual boyfriend starts looking like a defective appliance?
Text or leave a voice message: 310-737-TALK
