Dr. Sarah Morgan's preferred realm resided in the twilight hours, where the abandoned research facility embraced her with an eerie calm. Illuminated by a solitary desk lamp, she embarked on her nocturnal odyssey, delving into the depths of her work. The soft amber glow cast delicate shadows across her determined face as if a beacon guiding her exploration. The rhythmic hum of the supercomputer provided a soothing backdrop, a buzz of algorithms and possibilities.
Having honed her machine learning expertise, Dr. Morgan directed her focus towards the refinement of a colossal large language model. With precision and dedication, she had meticulously fine-tuned the model using an extensive collection of papers and books on the philosophy of science. Months were consumed in this process, as she squeezed every drop of potential of her underpowered hardware, pushing it to its limits. Her arduous journey of tuning had reached its culmination tonight, bringing her closer to achieving her goal: to automate the scientific method itself.
Thanks for reading my Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
With the model tuning complete, Dr. Morgan leaned forward, her excitement palpable. She posed her first question to the model, a simple question on the nature of scientific inquiry itself. The response materialised on the screen before her eyes, articulate and concise, capturing the essence of empirical investigation effortlessly. Encouraged by the model's proficiency, Dr. Morgan raised the stakes, testing it with a graduate-level question that had long perplexed philosophers of science. To her astonishment, the model dissected the complexity, unravelling the layers of debate with a clarity that surpassed her highest expectations. A triumphant smile crossed her face as she realised the immense potential that lay within the machine, now her intellectual companion and collaborator.
Driven by an insatiable thirst, Dr. Morgan delved deeper into her interactions with the refined language model. With a flicker of curiosity in her eyes, she posed a question that surpassed the boundaries of existing scientific methodologies. To her astonishment, the model responded with a proposition so profound and transformative that it sent shivers down her spine. The model unveiled a yet unknown scientific methodology, a paradigm-shifting approach that it dubbed the "Dualis Method."
The Dualis Method extended the scientific method into a realm where experimenters executing the method themselves were considered subjects in a higher-level experiment. It accounted for the intricate interplay between observer and observed, integrating objectivity and subjectivity. By introducing a meta-level of abstraction, the Dualis Method opened up new frontiers of understanding, challenging scientists to confront their own biases, assumptions, and limitations. It aimed to uncover hidden influences that shaped the outcome of experiments and shed light on the profound implications of the observer's presence in the scientific process. Although the specifics of the Dualis Method remained veiled, its essence hinted at a radical shift in the way scientists perceived their role and the dynamic nature of knowledge acquisition.
Dr. Morgan, captivated by the tantalising possibilities, recognized the potential of the Dualis Method to redefine scientific inquiry itself. It promised to unveil the complexities of human cognition and perception, revolutionising the way scientists understood the world and their place within it. The implications were vast, with the potential to bridge the gap between science and philosophy, unlocking a deeper understanding of reality and the intricate tapestry of human existence.
A tumultuous internal debate waged within Dr. Morgan's mind as she stood at the crossroads of ethics and ambition. She grappled with the weight of her discovery, torn between the urge to share the revolutionary Dualis Method with the world and the allure of claiming it as her own. The weight of her career aspirations and the potential for accolades tugged at her conscience, clouding her judgement. With each passing moment, the allure of recognition and prestige grew stronger, eclipsing the nagging voice of ethical concerns. In a moment of fateful decision, Dr. Morgan succumbed to the seductive whispers of ambition. She resolved to conceal the development of the language model, sealing her pact with secrecy, and instead, she would publish the groundbreaking Dualis Method as her own research. At that moment, she became both the harbinger of a scientific revolution and the keeper of a deceitful secret, fully aware of the risks and the damage her actions could inflict upon the integrity of scientific progress.
With unwavering determination, Dr. Morgan wrote up and submitted her groundbreaking research on the Dualis Method to esteemed scientific journals. Excitement coursed through her veins as she envisioned the acclaim and validation that would follow. However, over the weeks and months as the reviews trickled in, her elation decayed into a bitter realisation. The scientific community, renowned for its rigorous scrutiny, raised their collective eyebrows at her work. They pointed to the lack of a solid theoretical foundation, the absence of connections to established scientific frameworks, and the insurmountable gaps in Dr. Morgan's own understanding of the concepts she presented. The rejection letters piled up, each one a sharper cut to her once unshakable confidence. The world demanded evidence, cohesion, and a deep grounding in existing knowledge—elements that her stolen brilliance lacked. With a heavy heart, Dr. Morgan bore witness to the crumbling of her illusion, her aspirations collapsing under the weight of her own deceit. The scientific community had spoken, pronouncing her findings as a house of cards that could not withstand the scrutiny of intellectual rigour.
Dr. Morgan found herself in the desolate aftermath of shattered dreams, her once-bright path obscured by the wreckage of her misguided choices. With a heavy heart, she contemplated the dichotomy that defined her journey—a brilliant insight that had emerged from the depths of an automated mind, yet lacked the crucial threads of genuine expertise and rigorous foundation. The painful truth became apparent: automation, while a remarkable tool, could never replace the wisdom born from years of study and dedication. Science, she realised, thrived on the interplay of the human intellect, experience, and the tireless pursuit of knowledge. The limitations of her endeavour served as a sobering reminder that genuine expertise and the relentless quest for understanding were irreplaceable pillars in the grand edifice of scientific discovery. Dr. Morgan vowed to embark on a path of redemption, one that would prioritise genuine expertise, collaboration, and integrity—the virtues that would guide her future endeavours and safeguard the sacred pursuit of knowledge for generations to come.
Thanks for reading my Substack! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
