Beautiful Freedom in Coordination with the Cogitating Ceviche Presents
The Christian Case for Free Speech: Why We Must Defend It, Even for Our EnemiesBy: Calista F. Freiheit
Narration by Amazon Polly
“If the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.” — John 8:36
In an era marked by ideological polarization and increasing attempts to limit expression, the call to uphold free speech has never been more urgent. As Christians who deeply cherish the liberating truth of the Gospel, we are compelled to examine the full spectrum of freedom that Christ offers—a freedom that extends to even those whose words we find repugnant or harmful. At its core, the Christian understanding of liberty finds its foundation in the biblical narrative of redemption and liberation. It is this very narrative that insists upon a freedom which is not confined by the boundaries of personal comfort or partisan bias, but that embraces even the voices of our adversaries, for only in a truly free society can the truth of Christ be proclaimed without restraint.
1. The Biblical Roots of Liberty
The Scriptures offer a robust testimony to the sanctity of freedom as a gift from God—a gift that transcends the mere absence of physical constraint to encompass the liberty of speech and the freedom of thought. From the Exodus, where God delivered His people from the oppressive chains of Pharaoh, to the example set by Paul in his bold exercise of Roman citizenship, the Bible consistently champions a model of liberty that is interwoven with divine purpose. The commandment against bearing false witness presupposes that the act of speaking truthfully is itself a liberation from deceit and oppression. In the Gospel narratives, even when Christ was maligned and misrepresented, He chose not to invoke governmental power to silence His detractors. Instead, He relied on the transformative power of truth, famously inviting those without sin to cast the first stone (John 8:7).
This scriptural foundation extends beyond isolated incidents; it is reflective of a broader biblical theology that sees truth and freedom as inseparable. The call to freedom is not confined to the deliverance from sin—it is, in its fullest expression, a call to liberate the individual to speak, to seek, and to proclaim. When Christ declares that truth will set us free (John 8:32), He is also affirming that the pursuit and expression of truth is a God-ordained endeavor. In societies where free speech is curtailed, the very conditions that allow the Gospel to flourish are undermined. Historically, wherever the voice of the Gospel has been allowed unimpeded expression, communities have experienced an outpouring of intellectual and spiritual vitality. In contrast, when censorship takes root—often under the guise of protecting the collective from offense—the Church has invariably suffered, and with it, the broader society has lost one of its most potent forces for transformation.
As Christians, we are thus called to recognize that defending free speech is not a secular or neutral act; it is a defense of the very freedoms that our faith holds sacred. Each time a voice is silenced, regardless of its content, the possibility for divine truth to penetrate hardened hearts is diminished. This understanding compels us to uphold a principle of freedom so robust that it leaves no room for partiality—a freedom that does not discriminate based on the popularity or piety of the speaker.
2. Historical Lessons from the Church
History offers a series of cautionary tales that underscore the perils of permitting any form of censorship, even when it is cloaked in the rhetoric of religious piety. The early Church, in its struggle to survive under Roman persecution, demonstrated that the pursuit of truth must often be waged in environments hostile to its expression. Yet, as centuries passed, there were also moments when Christians themselves became complicit in restricting speech, using their societal influence to silence dissenting views—even those that emerged within the faith.
The Inquisition, a period marked by a zealous drive to root out heresy, stands as a stark reminder of the dangers inherent in conflating doctrinal purity with the suppression of free inquiry. While the motivations may have been steeped in a genuine desire to protect the soul from eternal damnation, the methods employed resulted in a profound betrayal of the Christian commitment to truth and liberty. Such historical episodes illustrate that any attempt to criminalize dissent in the name of protecting the faith invariably backfires, creating an environment where the spirit of inquiry and honest debate is stifled.
In the context of colonial America, the struggle for free expression took on a distinctly pragmatic dimension. Believers—often dissenters by default—faced incarceration and persecution simply for sharing their interpretations of Scripture and challenging established ecclesiastical norms. The conviction that freedom of speech was essential to the practice of faith was a driving force behind the American Revolution and ultimately found its most enduring expression in the First Amendment. Influential figures like James Madison, inspired by the courage of individuals like Baptist preacher John Leland, argued that any suppression of speech, even if justified as a defense against blasphemy or error, posed a threat to the fundamental liberties that underpin the nation. Their legacy serves as a powerful reminder that the fight for liberty has always been a struggle not just for a particular group, but for every citizen.
Moreover, these historical lessons reflect a broader truth: that the suppression of free speech is invariably a slippery slope. When the state—or even the church—determines which ideas are permissible, it begins a descent into authoritarianism, one in which the arbitrary enforcement of moral judgments leads to a loss of individual rights. This lesson, painfully learned through centuries of struggle and sacrifice, reinforces the imperative that Christians must remain vigilant in the defense of all speech. Only through such a commitment can we ensure that future generations inherit a society where truth is not dictated by power, but is freely spoken and earnestly sought after.
3. The Philosophy of Principled Tolerance
Defending free speech as a Christian is not an endorsement of every idea or the wholesale acceptance of hate; rather, it is a principled stance predicated on the belief that truth is best discerned in the marketplace of ideas. This philosophy of principled tolerance distinguishes between the act of speaking and the value of the message itself. It is possible—and indeed necessary—to challenge and condemn views that are antithetical to the teachings of Christ without advocating for their suppression.
At its core, this position rests on the conviction that truth, when liberated from the constraints of censorship, is self-validating. The words that flow unimpeded through society engage with counterarguments and are subjected to rigorous testing in public discourse. It is in this open environment that falsehoods are exposed and reformulated through honest debate. To selectively mute voices, even those deemed offensive or dangerous by our subjective standards, is to undermine the very process through which truth emerges and is refined.
Philosophically, this approach is reminiscent of the great liberal tradition that values the freedom of expression as an inalienable human right. A consistent defense of free speech demands that we extend this right universally—even to those whose viewpoints we find abhorrent. Such a commitment is not an abdication of our moral responsibility; rather, it is an affirmation of the dignity of every human being, created in the image of God. By defending the right of all to speak, we are implicitly upholding the value of individual conscience and the belief that each person has the capacity to discern truth with the guidance of divine revelation.
This stance also functions as a safeguard against the tyranny of the majority—a scenario in which the prevailing cultural or political norms could easily be weaponized to silence dissent. In times of rapid social change, when shifts in public opinion might favor the suppression of unpopular views under the guise of protecting community standards, our unwavering commitment to free speech serves as a bulwark against creeping authoritarianism. The willingness to engage with and challenge even the most distasteful ideas reaffirms our faith in a society where reason and conscience are respected above the transient whims of popular opinion.
4. Modern Threats to Biblical Expression
In today’s socio-political climate, the challenges to free speech are multifaceted and often cloaked in the rhetoric of progressivism and social justice. In many Western democracies, attempts to restrict speech under the banner of combating hate have dangerously blurred the line between protecting vulnerable communities and stifling legitimate religious expression. For instance, debates over what constitutes "hate speech" have, in certain jurisdictions, led to scenarios where even the scholarly reading of Romans or the proclamation of biblical truths can be misconstrued as inciting hatred.
Contemporary legal frameworks, particularly in parts of Europe and Canada, have begun to define hate speech in ways that inadvertently threaten the freedom of religious expression. Pastors and theologians, who have long relied on the rigorous exegesis of Scripture to challenge cultural norms and to confront moral decay, now find themselves at risk of legal reprisals for articulating doctrines that some consider controversial. This development is particularly alarming, as it not only curtails religious freedom but also sets a precedent that could eventually be exploited to silence all forms of dissent—including the kind that upholds Christian values.
The modern threats to biblical expression are not merely theoretical concerns; they are manifest in policies and legal actions that undermine the right to speak freely. Attempts to regulate speech through broad and ambiguous definitions of hate speech risk creating an environment in which no one feels secure in expressing their beliefs openly. The danger is that in our zeal to create a society free from offense, we inadvertently erect barriers to the expression of truth. This, in turn, compromises the Church’s mission of preaching the Gospel, as any limitation on speech invariably results in a limitation on the proclamation of hope and redemption.
It is imperative for Christians to recognize that defending free speech in the modern context is a matter of both spiritual and civic urgency. While the intent behind hate speech regulations may be to foster a more inclusive and respectful public sphere, the outcome is often the opposite—a chilling effect on open discourse that diminishes the very diversity of thought that enriches our culture. A robust commitment to free speech ensures that the Gospel is not relegated to whispered conversations in the dark, but is instead proclaimed boldly in the public square, where all ideas, even those that offend, are subject to the illumination of reason and truth.
5. A Christian’s Responsibility in the Public Square
The mission of the Church has always extended beyond the confines of the pew, reaching into the very heart of the public square where ideas are exchanged and cultural values are contested. As followers of Christ, we are tasked with the responsibility to defend not just our beliefs, but the framework that allows diverse opinions to coexist. To restrict free speech is to undermine the fundamental right of every individual to use the God-given faculties of reason, conscience, and discernment.
Historically, the Apostle Paul provides a model for engaging with the public sphere. When he traveled to synagogues, marketplaces, and even the civic center of Mars Hill, he did so not by coercing silence from those who opposed him, but by engaging in robust debate. His approach was marked by both courage and humility—qualities that are essential for any Christian who wishes to influence public discourse. Rather than seeking to banish opposing views, Paul exposed them to the light of reason and the power of the Gospel. This method, grounded in both intellectual rigor and spiritual conviction, reminds us that censorship is not the pathway to victory; rather, it is the truth, spoken freely, that has the power to transform hearts and minds.
In today’s increasingly polarized political environment, the temptation to censor ideas that conflict with our understanding of Scripture is strong. Yet, history teaches us that when we begin down the path of suppression, we are not only silencing others—we are diminishing our own capacity to speak truth to power. A government or institution that seeks to control speech today may very well become the same entity that silences our voices tomorrow. Hence, the defense of free speech is not merely about protecting inconvenient opinions; it is about safeguarding our future as a nation and as a Church.
Our Christian duty, then, is twofold. First, we must advocate for legal and societal structures that protect free expression, ensuring that even unpopular and controversial views have the opportunity to be heard. Second, we must model an example of gracious dialogue—engaging in respectful, thoughtful discourse even when encountering ideas that starkly contradict our beliefs. In doing so, we do not compromise our moral convictions, but rather affirm the worth of every human being, created in God’s image, and capable of contributing to the collective pursuit of truth.
Conclusion: The Imperative of Defending Liberty
The imperative to defend free speech, even for those whose views we abhor, is a clarion call to uphold the very principles upon which our freedom in Christ is founded. The freedom to speak, to question, and to challenge lies at the heart of both a vibrant society and a robust faith. By advocating for the rights of every individual—including our adversaries—we affirm that truth is not a static commodity to be safeguarded behind closed doors but an ever-evolving revelation that must be freely exchanged in the light of open debate.
For Christians, this commitment to free speech is intrinsically linked to our faith. The Gospel teaches us that while sin may bind us in error, the truth of Christ liberates us to a life of authentic expression and fearless proclamation. In defending the right of all to speak, we are not capitulating to moral relativism or endorsing divisiveness; we are, in fact, ensuring that the enduring legacy of our faith remains unassailable. Only by preserving the freedom of expression can we hope to counter the forces of censorship that seek to silence the truth and, by extension, the light of Christ in the world.
As we stand today at the crossroads of societal change, let us remember that the fight for free speech is ultimately a fight for our future—the future of our nation, our culture, and our Church. The danger of allowing suppression in the name of protecting the vulnerable is that it opens the door to a broader erosion of all freedoms. Therefore, our defense of free speech must be unwavering and all-encompassing, affirming that every voice, even those of our enemies, has the right to speak. In doing so, we safeguard not only the expression of our own beliefs but also the sanctity of a society built on the enduring truths of liberty, conscience, and faith.
Let us then embrace the challenge with resolute hearts, advocating for a society where free speech flourishes, and truth is allowed to triumph over the shadows of censorship. In the end, it is our steadfast commitment to liberty that enables us to proclaim Christ’s redeeming power without fear—and to trust that, in a truly free world, every voice has a role in the symphony of truth.
Thank you for your time today. Until next time, God Bless.
Do you like what you read but aren’t yet ready or able to get a paid subscription? Then consider a one-time tip at:
https://www.venmo.com/u/TheCogitatingCeviche
Ko-fi.com/thecogitatingceviche
