The Unprovoked Attack: A Deeper Dive
On the fateful morning of October 7, 2023, the atmosphere near Kibbutz Re'im was filled with the joyous sounds of an all-night music festival. People from various walks of life had gathered to celebrate life and music, completely unaware of the horror that was about to unfold. As the sun began to rise, Hamas militants stormed the festival grounds, guns blazing, turning a place of celebration into a killing field. The attack was not just unprovoked; it was meticulously planned to inflict maximum damage.
The immediate aftermath was devastating, with 250 lives lost in the blink of an eye. But the ripple effects of this attack were felt far beyond the festival grounds. It escalated the already tense relations between Israel and Palestine to a breaking point, leading to a renewed cycle of violence and counter-violence. Israel reported that Hamas militants killed 1,400 people in a rampage through Israeli towns and Kibbutzes, and around 240 hostages were taken1.
What followed was equally disturbing. Across the globe, streets filled with protesters condemning Israel, waving Palestinian flags, and shouting anti-Semitic slogans. The irony? Many of these protests were organized and led by individuals who identify as progressive. These are the same people who, under different circumstances, would be the first to stand up against hate, violence, and discrimination. Yet, when it came to this unprovoked attack by a terrorist organization, their moral compass seemed to falter.
This raises several unsettling questions. Why would those who champion human rights and social justice support or remain silent about an act of unprovoked aggression by a terrorist organization? How can one reconcile progressive ideals with the endorsement or tacit acceptance of terrorism? The cognitive dissonance is not just perplexing; it's deeply troubling for anyone genuinely committed to justice and equality.
The Inconvenient Truth: Unpacking the Silence
In the days following the October 7 attack, Human Rights Watch released a report that verified videos from the attacks, showing deliberate killings by Hamas-led gunmen2. These weren't just acts of violence but calculated moves designed to instill fear and exert power. Human Rights Watch didn't mince words; they called for these attacks to be investigated as war crimes. The International Criminal Court (ICC) also took note, emphasizing the gravity of the situation.
Yet, where were the voices that usually clamor for justice and human rights? The silence from progressive quarters was not just noticeable; it was glaring. Social media platforms, often ablaze with calls for justice in other contexts, were eerily quiet when it came to condemning Hamas. This silence was not passive; it was an active choice to ignore a situation that didn't fit neatly into a preconceived narrative.
This selective silence is not just a betrayal of the victims of the attack; it's a betrayal of the very principles that progressives claim to uphold. The absence of outrage or even balanced discussion from progressive thought leaders and influencers raises serious questions about the integrity of the movement. If the progressive community can't stand up against clear acts of terrorism and human rights violations, then what exactly does it stand for?
The silence also has real-world implications. It emboldens extremist groups like Hamas by signaling that their actions will not be universally condemned. It undermines efforts to achieve a just and lasting peace in the region by perpetuating a one-sided narrative. And most importantly, it erodes the moral authority of the progressive movement, casting doubt on its commitment to universal human rights and justice.
The Progressive Paradox: The Selective Outrage Dilemma
The involvement of self-proclaimed progressives in the anti-Israel protests following the October 7 attack is a paradox that's hard to ignore. These individuals have built their identities around advocating for social justice, equality, and human rights. They march for climate change, rally against racial injustice, and advocate for gender equality. Yet, when it comes to the atrocities committed by Hamas—a group designated as a terrorist organization by the United States, the European Union, and several other countries—their outrage is conspicuously selective.
This selective outrage is not just a minor oversight; it's a glaring contradiction that undermines the very foundation of progressivism. How can one claim to stand for human rights while turning a blind eye to a terrorist organization that deliberately targets civilians? How can one march for peace and justice one day and then support or tacitly endorse a group that commits war crimes the next?
The cognitive dissonance is staggering. On the one hand, progressives are quick to condemn Israel for its actions in the conflict, often without acknowledging the complex geopolitical factors at play. On the other hand, they remain silent or even defend the actions of Hamas, effectively giving them a free pass to continue their reign of terror. This isn't just inconsistent; it's intellectually dishonest.
This selective outrage also has a ripple effect beyond the progressive community. It sends a dangerous message that some lives are more valuable than others and that some acts of violence are more acceptable if they fit a particular narrative. This is not just morally indefensible; it's a betrayal of the principles that underpin the progressive movement.
The question then arises: Is this what progressivism has come to? A movement so entangled in its ideological web that it can't see the glaring contradictions in its stance? If progressivism is to have any meaningful impact on the world, it needs to resolve this paradox and reclaim its moral high ground. Anything less is a disservice to the ideals it claims to uphold.
The Silence of Progressive Thought Leaders: A Damning Indictment
The silence from progressive thought leaders on the issue is not just deafening; it's damning. These individuals have significant influence, whose words and actions shape public opinion and policy. They are the ones who pen op-eds, appear on talk shows, and have large social media followings. Yet, when it comes to the unprovoked attacks by Hamas and the subsequent anti-Israel protests, their voices are conspicuously absent.
This absence is not a mere oversight; it's a calculated decision not to rock the boat or challenge the prevailing narrative within the progressive community. It's a decision that raises serious questions about the integrity and credibility of these thought leaders. Suppose they choose to remain silent in the face of blatant terrorism and anti-Semitism. What does that say about their commitment to the principles they champion?
The lack of balanced perspectives from progressive thought leaders also creates an echo chamber that only reinforces existing biases. Without critical voices to challenge the prevailing narrative, misinformation spreads unchecked, further polarizing an already divided public. This is not just an intellectual failing; it's a moral one. By choosing silence over speaking the truth, these thought leaders are complicit in perpetuating a one-sided narrative that does more harm than good.
This silence also has broader implications for the progressive movement as a whole. It undermines the movement's credibility, casting doubt on its commitment to truth and justice. It also creates a vacuum often filled by extremist voices, further polarizing the discourse and making meaningful dialogue increasingly difficult.
The silence of progressive thought leaders is a missed opportunity to bring nuance and balance to a highly charged issue. It's a failure to use their platforms to stand up for what's right, even when it's unpopular. And most importantly, it's a betrayal of the principles of justice, equality, and human rights that they claim to stand for.
The Moral Bankruptcy: A Crisis of Conscience within Progressivism
The anti-Israel protests that erupted in the wake of the October 7 attacks reveal a disturbing moral bankruptcy within the progressive movement. This is not just a matter of differing opinions or complex geopolitics but a fundamental rebuke of the principles progressives claim to hold dear. When individuals who identify as progressive take to the streets to protest Israel but remain silent on the atrocities committed by Hamas, it exposes a glaring ethical void.
This moral bankruptcy is not a fringe phenomenon; it's a systemic issue that calls into question the core of what it means to be progressive. Justice, equality, and the sanctity of human life are supposed to be the cornerstones of the progressive ideology. Yet, they are undermining these very principles by supporting a narrative that is not just one-sided but factually incorrect.
This isn't just a philosophical issue; it has real-world consequences. By failing to condemn acts of terrorism, the progressive movement is indirectly contributing to a culture that tolerates violence and extremism. It's a dangerous precedent that not only jeopardizes the prospects for peace in the Middle East but also undermines global efforts to combat terrorism and promote human rights.
Moreover, this moral bankruptcy has a corrosive effect on public discourse. It reduces complex issues to simplistic narratives, stifles critical thinking, and polarizes communities. It turns allies into enemies and makes meaningful dialogue almost impossible. This is the last thing we need in a world that is already divided.
The progressive movement is at a crossroads. It can either confront this moral bankruptcy head-on and realign itself with its foundational principles or continue down a path that undermines its credibility and effectiveness. The choice is clear, but making the right choice requires introspection and honesty, which has been sorely lacking. It's time for the progressive movement to take a long, hard look in the mirror and ask itself what it truly stands for.
The Way Forward: A Call to Action for Genuine Progressives
The current state of affairs is a litmus test for the progressive movement, revealing uncomfortable truths about bias, hypocrisy, and the selective application of principles. But it's also an opportunity for genuine progressives to stand up and be counted, to question the narratives being pushed without critical examination, and to hold their peers accountable for the hypocrisy and selective outrage that undermines the credibility of the entire movement.
This is not just about the Israeli-Palestine conflict; it is about the soul of progressivism. If the movement is to have any meaningful impact, it needs to be rooted in principles that are universally applied, not selectively wielded to fit a particular narrative. This means standing up against injustice, regardless of who the perpetrator is. It means advocating for human rights, even when it's politically inconvenient. And most importantly, it means having the courage to speak out, even when it's unpopular.
The way forward is not easy; it requires a willingness to confront uncomfortable truths and to challenge long-held beliefs. But it's a necessary journey if progressivism is to remain a force for good. It starts with education by making an effort to understand the complexities of issues like the Israel-Palestine conflict rather than reducing them to simplistic narratives. It involves engaging in meaningful dialogue with those with different views rather than shutting them out or labeling them as 'other.'
But perhaps most importantly, it involves taking action. Whether using social media platforms to share balanced perspectives, participating in peaceful protests that advocate for justice for all, or holding community discussions to foster understanding, every action counts. Silence is complicity, and the time for silence is over.
The way forward is clear, but it requires action, integrity, and a commitment to the principles of justice, equality, and human rights. It's time for the progressive movement to rise to the occasion and prove that it's genuinely committed to making the world a better place for everyone, not just those who fit into a particular narrative.
Final Thoughts: A Litmus Test for Progressivism
The anti-Israel protests in the wake of the October 7 attacks serve as a revealing litmus test for the progressive movement. They expose the uncomfortable truths about bias, hypocrisy, and the selective application of principles that have long been swept under the rug. These protests are not just isolated events but symptomatic of deeper issues within the progressive community that must be addressed.
If progressivism is to remain a force for good, it must confront these issues head-on with honesty and integrity. It must be willing to challenge its own biases and to hold itself accountable for its actions—or lack thereof. It must be willing to engage in difficult conversations, even when those conversations challenge the prevailing narrative. And most importantly, it must be willing to stand up for what's right, even when it's difficult, unpopular, or inconvenient.
This is not just a challenge for the progressive movement but for society as a whole. In an increasingly polarized world, the need for nuanced, balanced perspectives has never been greater. The need for a progressive movement rooted in principles rather than politics has never been more urgent.
The October 7 attacks and their aftermath have exposed the cracks in the foundation of the progressive movement. But they have also provided growth, reflection, and meaningful change opportunities. The question now is whether the progressive community will seize this opportunity or continue to turn a blind eye to the inconsistencies and contradictions that undermine its credibility.
The choice is clear, but making the right choice requires courage, conviction, and a commitment to the principles that define progressivism. The ball is now in the progressive court. It's time to step up and show the world what progressivism is truly about.
Learn More: Resources for Balanced Perspectives on Israel
If you're interested in gaining a more nuanced understanding of Israel and its complex geopolitical landscape, there are several non-partisan organizations and resources that can offer valuable insights. Here are some recommendations:
* Anti-Defamation League (ADL): ADL tracks the rise of anti-Semitism globally and offers a wide range of materials, including an activist guide for Israel advocacy.
* AIPAC: The American Israel Public Affairs Committee provides in-depth analyses of issues related to the American-Israeli political relationship.
* Honest Reporting: This organization monitors media bias and promotes balanced reporting on Israel.
* NGO Monitor: This organization provides critical analysis and reports on the activities of international and local NGOs in the context of the Arab-Israeli conflict.
* UN Watch: A Geneva-based NGO that monitors the performance of the United Nations, particularly in relation to Israel.
* The Washington Institute: This institute aims to advance a balanced and realistic understanding of American interests in the Middle East.
* World Zionist Organization: Committed to promoting Zionism and the Zionist idea through Israel Education as vital and positive elements of contemporary Jewish life.
* The Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs (JCPA): Offers a model of applied diplomacy and frequently holds conferences and publishes research on topics such as Jerusalem, International law, human rights, and more.
* Israel 21c: An independent non-profit website providing an in-depth look at Israel beyond the conflict, focusing on Israel's contribution to making the world a better place.
These resources offer a range of perspectives and are committed to providing balanced, factual information. Whether you're an advocate, a student, or simply someone looking to understand the complexities of the Israel-Palestine issue, these organizations offer a wealth of information to help you form your own opinions.
References
* Reuters. (2023, October 31). 'I was reborn' on October 7, says survivor of Hamas attack on Israeli festival. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/i-was-reborn-oct-7-says-survivor-hamas-attack-israeli-festival-2023-10-31/
* Human Rights Watch. (2023, October 18). Israel/Palestine: Videos of Hamas-Led Attacks Verified. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/10/18/israel/palestine-videos-hamas-led-attacks-verified
The Cogitating Ceviché is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Do you like what you read but aren’t yet ready or able to get a paid subscription? Then consider a one-time tip at:
https://www.venmo.com/u/TheCogitatingCeviche
Ko-fi.com/thecogitatingceviche
