Is it even possible to have empirical evidence for God's existence? What if the stars realigned to spell out "I exist! Sincerely, God." Wouldn't THAT count as evidence for God? It seems that the answer is yes. But then, various objections to arguments for God seem to imply that even this extravagant, awesome evidence for God would not be any evidence whatsoever for theism. To many philosophers, that implication implies that these objections prove too much, and must therefore fail. In this debate, eight philosophers go head-to-head over these fascinating questions.
Video of this interview is available on YouTube.
To support the channel, do please oh please consider donating, either via PayPal or Buy Me a Coffee.
Follow me on X because you’re awesome.
EPISODE CHAPTERS
00:00:00 Introduction
00:02:10 Miles Donahue’s opening statement
00:07:46 Brian Cutter’s opening statement
00:13:16 Noah McKay’s opening statement
00:18:30 Travis Dumsday’s opening statement
00:23:30 Paul Draper’s opening statement
00:29:15 Alex Malpass’s opening statement
00:35:18 Nathan Bray’s opening statement
00:40:41 Kevin Scharp’s opening statement
00:47:15 Miles Donahue’s cross-examination
01:03:22 Alex Malpass’s cross-examination
01:20:15 Brian Cutter’s cross-examination
01:33:41 Nathan Bray’s cross-examination
01:49:03 Paul Draper’s cross-examination
02:01:21 Travis Dumsday’s cross-examination
02:10:54 Kevin Scharp’s cross-examination
02:24:49 Noah McKay’s cross-examination
