This episode started a little rough on my end. Jason joined a few minutes late. There was background noise in my house. While trying to pause and pivot, I accidentally disconnected the first livestream. We restarted, recalibrated, and kept going.
I am naming that upfront because this was the conversation. Chaos was not theoretical but showed up in real time and in real life while you were trying to think, speak, organize, and stay coherent. That was exactly what this episode was about.
Once we got settled, we focused on how chaos functions as a governing strategy right now. We talked about the 2024 election and the road to the midterms. We discussed Epstein document dumps without adjudication, ICE funding theater that does not interrupt enforcement, and the constant deferral of accountability to the next election.
Jason shared that Greg Palast’s “Vigilante Inc.” documentary hit him hard this week. It detailed voter suppression tactics, including a woman in Marjorie Taylor Greene’s district who was able to challenge over 30,000 ballots in Georgia. We discussed how these suppression methods extended to Michigan, where 63,000 mail-in ballots were challenged in a state Trump allegedly won by only 80,000 votes.
We also raised the RNC/DNC hack from years ago. Both parties were hacked, but only DNC information was released. We discussed how prominent Republicans like Lindsey Graham and Ted Cruz went from publicly opposing Trump to becoming his staunchest defenders almost overnight after that hack occurred. The pattern suggests blackmail as a governing mechanism, not just chaos.
Roger Stone’s name came up as well. Jason noted Stone has been “quite quiet as of lately” despite his central role in Trump’s political operations and early Q conspiracy manipulation. This connects to the broader pattern: instrumental architects fade from view while chaos keeps attention scattered across multiple fronts.
We also spoke about how Democratic officials are responding to analysis from groups like Election Truth Alliance. Not by engaging the methods, but by dismissing the data as not evidence. Often the response is to suggest that anyone raising questions about 2024 sounds like the 2020 crowd. That comparison itself became part of the discussion being used to shut down scrutiny without actually addressing machines, verification barriers, or precinct level patterns.
We reviewed where power still moves such as California being allowed to proceed with redistricting matters because it shows what structural action looks like at the state level. Actual leverage. Additionally, we spoke about the potential for states to do more to support their people.
This was not a polished episode. It was a real one. If things feel overwhelming or fragmented right now, that is not a personal failure. It is the environment we are operating in.
Do not rank the crises but notice why they are never allowed to resolve.
Articles discussed / promised in the livestream:
California redistricting ruling (state-level structural leverage, not a victory lap):
Michigan article Jason raised (officials pushing back on 2024 doubts and dismissing data through “familiar claims”):
Thank you Wolfgang Mehrmann, Tamera Cunningham, Patricia A. Burgemeister, Sherry@theresnobodytoblame, - - and many others for tuning into Rigged by Design with Jason! Join us for our next live video in the app on Feb 12, 2026 at 10:00 a.m. PST / 1:00 p.m. EST.
Truth doesn’t come in neutral — Zorha.
If this work matters to you, subscribe to Jasonand me as we keep documenting what others rush past or refuse to touch.
Support is never expected, but always appreciated. Subscriptions and Buy Me a Coffee help keep this work independent, accessible, and ongoing. All core reporting remains free — support simply helps me keep digging.
