Every few years, a U.S. administration publishes its National Security Strategy—a grand, self-congratulatory mission statement that tells the world what Washington thinks it stands for. Most are boring, bureaucratic, and easy to ignore. The 2025 version under Trump is not one of those.
This document reads less like a policy white paper and more like a manifesto. It’s part ideological declaration, part foreign policy blueprint, and part campaign ad. From the opening pages—where Trump boasts of “obliterating” Iran’s nuclear facilities and “settling eight raging conflicts”—the tone is unmistakable: America is back, the elites are out, and the era of global restraint is over.
What’s striking isn’t the chest-thumping. It’s the reordering of priorities. The document opens with an “America First” premise so absolute that even earlier nationalist playbooks look tame. The top strategic priority is not China, Russia, or the Middle East—it’s the Western Hemisphere. Trump’s team even coins a “Trump Corollary” to the Monroe Doctrine: the U.S. will use force to prevent mass migration, keep out “hostile foreign ownership,” and assert total dominance across the Americas. It’s a throwback to the early 20th century—part Roosevelt, part Reagan, all Trump.
The rest of the strategy cascades from that worldview. The Indo-Pacific comes second, framed not as a defense of democracy but as a fight to “halt and reverse the damage foreign actors inflict on the American economy.” Europe appears third, with a pointed promise to “restore Europe’s civilizational self-confidence”—a polite way of saying Washington intends to bankroll nationalist governments over Brussels technocrats. The Middle East gets one line about avoiding “forever wars,” and then comes the fifth “region”: technology. AI, quantum, biotech—treated here as battlefields on par with geography itself.
At home, the strategy’s language tilts even harder toward cultural revolution. Trump calls for a “restoration of America’s spiritual and cultural health” and “strong traditional families that raise healthy children.” It’s the first time an NSS has explicitly fused domestic identity politics with national defense—turning family policy, immigration, and even birth rates into instruments of security.
Read together, the 2025 NSS is less about managing threats than about remaking the idea of what America is for. It marks the formal arrival of a populist, nationalist grand strategy—one that sees foreign policy, economics, and culture as part of a single struggle against decline. Whether it endures beyond this administration will depend on whether Americans come to see it as strategy—or simply as ideology dressed in statecraft.
