Survivor, The Apprentice, and the Game Theory of Governance, by journalist and researcher Peter Duke, co-written with Matthew Crawford of Rounding the Earth, investigates how two television programs — Survivor and The Apprentice — reshaped the cultural understanding of power. Duke and Crawford trace the mechanics of reality television to the mathematics of non-cooperative game theory, showing how millions of viewers learned to recognize hierarchy, manipulation, and authority through ritualized competition.
Television as a Political Engine
The essay positions Survivor, created by Mark Burnett and aired by CBS in 2000, as a social experiment that encodes governance within entertainment. Contestants build alliances, deceive allies, and vote out competitors until one survivor remains. The program’s structure teaches that power emerges through unstable coalitions. Temporary loyalty replaces enduring trust. Duke and Crawford argue that these mechanics reproduce the conditions of politics under uncertainty. Each episode demonstrates how individuals maneuver when institutions fail to secure fairness. Through identification, the audience learns that success depends on flexibility and persuasion more than on principle.
By contrast, The Apprentice, which premiered in 2004 under Burnett’s direction and Donald Trump’s authority, converts volatility into command. Trump governs the boardroom as a sovereign executive. Contestants perform competence through obedience, and each dismissal—sealed by the phrase “You’re fired” — reinforces the finality of vertical power. The essay defines this as a CEO-style elective monarchy, a structure in which legitimacy flows from decisive authority rather than from collective negotiation. Viewers absorb this choreography of dominance as entertainment and, in doing so, rehearse deference to singular command.
Game Theory and Behavioral Design
Duke and Crawford situate their argument within John Nash’s non-cooperative game theory, developed in the 1950s to model decision-making under conditions of trust and coordination breakdown. Both shows stage this logic. Players act without guarantees of honesty or stability. Every alliance conceals an incentive to betray. The rational actor survives by anticipating deception. Jeff Probst, the host of Survivor, even encouraged contestants to study Nash’s theory, acknowledging its explicit influence. The programs, Duke asserts, became televised laboratories of strategy. Viewers internalized their lessons intuitively: deception becomes rational, adaptability becomes virtue, and performance becomes survival.
In Survivor, betrayal and persuasion coexist. The jury—composed of the players who have been eliminated — returns to select the winner. This design transforms the rejected into sovereigns. Power circulates through loss. The audience witnesses a form of cyclical legitimacy: authority derives from those it displaces. Duke describes this as the “Republic of the Rejected,” where governance arises from judgment by the excluded. Each season enacts a miniature polity of resentment and reward. The format translates the fragility of trust into ritual entertainment.
The Apprentice and the Hierarchy of Command
The Apprentice replaces plural chaos with unitary order. Trump stands as the symbolic CEO of America Inc., surrounded by candidates who demonstrate worth through compliance. The camera isolates his pronouncements as absolute law. Duke and Crawford interpret this as formalism in action — the same idea articulated by theorist Curtis Yarvin, who proposed reorganizing the state along corporate lines under a single executive. Trump’s televised authority, Burnett’s production design, and the rituals of the boardroom converge to model the aesthetics of command.
The authors describe the show’s mise-en-scène — marble lobbies, corporate logos, and synchronized deliberations — as political theater disguised as a career opportunity. The audience learns that power depends on visibility and elimination. To win is to survive the gaze of the ruler. The catchphrase “You’re fired” becomes a linguistic act of sovereignty, a concise performance of judgment that would later echo at Trump’s political rallies.
Theoretical and Political Continuum
Duke and Crawford trace how the cultural template created by The Apprentice coincided with Yarvin’s formalist theory and Peter Thiel’s advocacy for efficient, CEO-like governance. Yarvin’s writings, under the pseudonym Mencius Moldbug, called the United States an outdated operating system in need of a reboot. Thiel’s statements questioning the compatibility of democracy and freedom further normalized the vision of strong executive control. The authors connect these ideas to Trump’s 2016 ascent, arguing that the image of decisive leadership built on television matured into a viable political identity.
They describe this sequence — Burnett constructing the spectacle, Yarvin codifying its philosophy, Thiel financing its network, and Trump embodying its form—as the moment when “the simulation produced a sovereign.” Television ceased to reflect politics and began to generate it. The sovereign emerged from the medium that trained the public to recognize him.
Spectacle as Governance
The podcast hosts discussing Duke’s essay emphasize how these shows acted as “Trojan horses of mind control.” The claim operates metaphorically: mass entertainment conditions citizens through pleasure. Each challenge, confession, and elimination installs behavioral patterns. The viewer consents to judgment as part of narrative satisfaction. Over time, governance itself acquires this structure—competition, evaluation, dismissal.
When Trump commanded a crowd at a 2024 rally with the chant “Fight, fight, fight,” Duke and Crawford interpret the moment as the direct expression of the same dramaturgy that defined The Apprentice. The sovereign now speaks from within the script television had rehearsed for two decades. Authority performs itself through repetition.
The Legacy of Televised Sovereignty
The essay concludes that modern governance operates as performance, and performance now governs perception. Power survives through visibility. The show logic has become the template for public decision-making. Citizens respond to leadership as audiences respond to contestants: through emotional recognition rather than deliberative assessment.
Peter Duke and Matthew Crawford’s analysis grounds these observations in a lineage of production decisions, theoretical developments, and political outcomes. Survivor trained viewers to navigate systems without trust; The Apprentice trained them to accept singular command. Together, the two shows mapped the boundaries of twenty-first-century sovereignty. This progression is cultural instruction. By televising the rules of the game, reality television reshaped how governance feels, how authority appears, and how the public learns to submit or resist within a stage built for spectacle.
The Duke Report is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Thanks to the generosity of my readers, all my articles are available for free access. Independent journalism, however, requires time and investment. If you found value in this article or any others, please consider sharing or even becoming a paid subscriber, who benefits by joining the conversation in the comments. I want you to know that your support is always gratefully received and will never be forgotten. Please buy me a coffee or as many as you wish.
The Duke Report - Where to Start
My articles on SubStack are all free to read/listen to. If you load the Substack app on your phone, Substack will read the articles to you. (Convenient if you are driving).
Foundational Articles
* Do You Know the Difference between Liberty and Freedom?
* The Power Structure of the World
* A User’s Guide to Neuro-Linguistic Defense
Podcast (Audio & Video Content)
* Palmerston’s Zoo Episode 01 - Solving the Paradox of Current World History (9 Episodes)
* Oligarchic Control from the Renaissance to the Information Age
* The Grand Design of the 20th Century
* Bots React to Neurolinguistic Defense
SoundCloud Book Podcasts
I’ve taken almost 200 foundational books for understanding how the world really works and posted them as audio podcasts on SoundCloud. If you load the app on your phone, you can listen to the AI robots discuss the books on your journeys across America.
* The Duke Report SoundCloud Channel
Duke Report Books
* Over 600 foundational books by journalists and academics that never made the New York Times Bestseller list, but somehow tell a history we never learned in school. LINK
