Thank you Veronica Swift, Larry Brownstein, Jessica Duke, Ordo Purgatio Flamma, Turbs, and many others for tuning into my live video!
Consciousness as Recognition of Frame
Duke defines consciousness as the recognition of one’s own frame. He uses the Greek term synodesis to emphasize awareness of the filter through which the world is perceived. To be conscious, in his definition, is to perceive not only external events but the internal mechanism that interprets them. He argues that those who lack frame recognition remain captives of manipulation, reacting rather than perceiving. The act of awareness — seeing one’s frame as a frame — constitutes liberation. He aligns this concept with the classical philosophical lineage of epistemology: the study of how we know what we know.
The Christian Frame: Love, Logos, Crisis, Praus
Duke’s epistemological method is anchored in what he calls the Christian frame, a fourfold structure: love, logos, crisis, and praus. Love directs perception toward compassion rather than demonization. Logos, understood as “that which can be done with words,” transforms speech into an act of divine participation—the capacity to translate inner order into communicable form. Crisis, drawn from the Greek krisis, means discernment: the capacity to separate truth from distortion. Praus, often translated as meekness, signifies reserved strength—the disciplined control of power. Together, these principles form his operational ethics for information warfare: discern through language, act through restraint, and root analysis in love.
The Structure of EpiWar™️
Duke defines epiwar as the organized manipulation of epistemology. The war does not aim to destroy bodies but to control cognition. He asserts that those who control the flow of information shape the boundaries of reality. Governments, corporations, and intelligence agencies operate as epistemic armies, crafting narratives that serve the maintenance of power. The front lines are digital; the weapons are symbols. He treats every public narrative—from elections to wars to cultural controversies—as a data stream engineered to direct emotion, belief, and consent.
Indicators of Epistemological Warfare
He identifies several indicators that reveal when a narrative belongs to epiwar. First, public stories that serve power rather than truth. He cites the Jeffrey Epstein case as a model: the ambiguity of his death, the convenience of its timing, and the way official explanations dissolve scrutiny. Second, the correlation between production value and deception. The higher the polish, he argues, the lower the truth quotient. Fear-based narratives saturated with cinematic imagery—alien invasions, nuclear annihilation, global pandemics—function as behavioral conditioning. Third, the disappearance of inconvenient knowledge, which he calls “the ongoing fire of the Library of Alexandria.” Data deletion, algorithmic censorship, and selective publication represent modern book burnings.
The Ontology of Control
To translate abstract epistemology into structure, Duke builds an ontological model of power. At the base of the pyramid stand the prisoners of the cave, the population described by Plato as those who mistake shadows for reality. Above them are the true believers—political activists driven by frustration and manipulated through identity narratives. Above them operate the assets: individuals who serve the system without realizing it. Duke confesses that he once occupied this role, documenting political movements as a photographer and unwittingly advancing agendas beyond his knowledge. The above assets are the handlers, who direct media and ideological currents on behalf of financiers and oligarchs. At the apex are the power elites: interlocking dynasties such as the Rockefellers, Rothschilds, DuPonts, Warburgs, and Schiffs, along with contemporary figures embedded in corporate finance.
Mechanisms of Manipulation: MICE+F
Duke expands the intelligence community acronym MICE — Money, Ideology, Compromise, Ego — by adding Family as a fifth element. These mechanisms, he explains, govern the conversion of individuals into instruments. Money purchases obedience. Ideology creates self-justifying servitude. Compromise blackmails. Ego flatters ambition until it becomes leash. Family binds through heritage and legacy. He illustrates the model through modern examples: political figures compromised by moral weakness, journalists controlled through career dependency, and media personalities sustained by ideological ego reinforcement. Duke presents MICE+F as the grammar of control through which handlers govern assets and maintain the obedience of every subordinate layer.
The Roundtable System
Power, Duke asserts, organizes itself not as a single hierarchy but as concentric roundtables—networks of elites maintaining mutual surveillance and loyalty through shared secrets. He references the historical design of Cecil Rhodes’s Round Table movement and its successors: the Council on Foreign Relations, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Bilderberg Group, the World Economic Forum, and the Club of Rome. Each table functions as an inner circle of a broader global syndicate. Members remain bound by what he calls the MICE ring — interlocking incentives and threats that ensure cohesion. Decisions are reached through consensus among peers who hold one another to ransom, creating an equilibrium of mutual captivity that guarantees the continuity of power.
The Function of Myth and Media
Duke traces the genealogy of modern myth-making. From H. G. Wells and C. S. Lewis to Steven Spielberg, he observes a continuous narrative pipeline producing cultural belief in extraterrestrials and nuclear terror. He describes this as transmedia conditioning: multiple industries generating coherent myth systems that shape the collective sense of possibility. The purpose of these myths, he claims, is not entertainment but the management of belief. When stories about space, apocalypse, or heroism saturate culture, they delineate the limits of what the public considers real. Through repetition, the imagined becomes structural reality.
Control Through Language and Pattern
Language, Duke argues, forms the circuitry of perception. Whoever defines terms defines the field of truth. He advises listeners to observe linguistic patterning — the repeated metaphors and syntactic rhythms that reinforce political authority. The manipulation of definition transforms debate into control. By altering the semantic frame, institutions engineer consent without force. Duke parallels this linguistic control with pattern recognition in nature. Like surfers reading the rhythm of waves, the conscious observer must read the rhythm of information. Recognition of pattern precedes freedom from manipulation.
From Political Disillusionment to Cognitive Rebellion
Duke recounts his personal transformation from participant to analyst. On January 6, 2021, he served as an embedded documentarian, photographing what he believed to be a patriotic demonstration. That event, he explains, revealed the machinery of manipulation—the convergence of media spectacle, political theater, and psychological control. The next day, January 7, he withdrew from political activism. The decision marked his shift from image production to frame analysis. By examining how images function as weapons, he turned the camera inward, from the world to the structure of perception itself.
The Migration of Power Centers
The episode concludes with Duke’s speculation on the geographic reconfiguration of global finance. He references reports that JPMorgan relocated gold-trading operations to Singapore and that key Western financial elites have established operational bases in Qatar. He interprets this as evidence of an eastward shift in the oligarchic network—a transfer of the “City of London” archetype to new coordinates. The movement signals, in his view, a recognition by elites that Western political systems can no longer guarantee their security or secrecy. Power adapts by migration, not dissolution.
Discernment as Liberation
Against this architecture of manipulation, Duke proposes discernment as the countermeasure. To frame reality consciously is to reclaim authorship over one’s own mind. He instructs listeners to approach information through the Christian frame—love as motive, logos as tool, crisis as method, praus as discipline. The process begins with humility before truth and advances through relentless attention to linguistic structure. Discernment, he insists, must precede judgment. Without discernment, action becomes reaction and belief becomes servitude. The practice of framing one’s own consciousness transforms epistemic war into spiritual warfare, with freedom as its victory condition.
Toward an Architecture of Thinking
Duke envisions epistemology as a lived discipline rather than an academic field. He calls for a reconstitution of thinking as moral architecture: each act of perception either strengthens or weakens the structure of truth within the self. The observer must learn to recognize patterns of manipulation as an architect recognizes load-bearing walls. Power survives through hidden design; liberation depends on structural literacy. To study framing is to study the blueprint of control. The mind that perceives its own architecture can no longer be built by others.
The Continuing Fire
The metaphor that closes the episode returns to the burning of the Library of Alexandria. Duke identifies that fire as perpetual—the continuous erasure of history and memory by those who control narrative production. His rebuilt studio stands as an answer to that fire, an act of reconstruction after obliteration. The oligarchy that destroyed his home attempted to erase both place and voice; the project that rose from the ashes functions as the library’s renewal. In that act, he finds purpose: to preserve consciousness against deletion, to teach discernment against deception, and to frame reality as a space where truth endures because it is seen.
Framing Reality concludes with an imperative: strengthen discernment, question the frame, live free.
The Duke Report is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Thanks to the generosity of my readers, all my articles are available for free access. Independent journalism, however, requires time and investment. If you found value in this article or any others, please consider sharing or even becoming a paid subscriber, who benefits by joining the conversation in the comments. I want you to know that your support is always gratefully received and will never be forgotten. Please buy me a coffee or as many as you wish.
The Duke Report - Where to Start
My articles on SubStack are all free to read/listen to. If you load the Substack app on your phone, Substack will read the articles to you. (Convenient if you are driving).
Foundational Articles
* Do You Know the Difference between Liberty and Freedom?
* The Power Structure of the World
* A User’s Guide to Neuro-Linguistic Defense
Podcast (Audio & Video Content)
* Palmerston’s Zoo Episode 01 - Solving the Paradox of Current World History (9 Episodes)
* Oligarchic Control from the Renaissance to the Information Age
* The Grand Design of the 20th Century
* Bots React to Neurolinguistic Defense
SoundCloud Book Podcasts
I’ve taken almost 200 foundational books for understanding how the world really works and posted them as audio podcasts on SoundCloud. If you load the app on your phone, you can listen to the AI robots discuss the books on your journeys across America.
* The Duke Report SoundCloud Channel
Duke Report Books
* Over 600 foundational books by journalists and academics that never made the New York Times Bestseller list, but somehow tell a history we never learned in school. LINK
