This isn’t commentary—it’s correction. In this episode, I break down the architecture of manipulation disguised as dialogue. From Charlie Kirk’s predatory debate tactics to the false equivalence peddled by tone-policing archetypes, we expose how coercion is dressed up as conversation and how refusal is reframed as stubbornness.
We name the badger. We reject the bully. We dismantle the guise of bullshit that masquerades as discourse. We clarify the difference between boundaring up and blocking—and why refusal to engage with distortion is not weakness, but wisdom.
This is for those who remember 2020. Who know that fascism doesn’t deserve a podium. Who understand that men in their 30s debating college students isn’t education—it’s exploitation.
If you’re tired of strawman arguments, ad hominem assaults, and performative civility, this episode is your archive.
We don’t debate fascists.
We document them. We don’t dilute. We inscribe.
Sai’s Newsletter is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
