ABOUT THAT ‘INFANT SUPER INTELLIGENCE’
Servos debuted as the robotic moving eyes in Jim Henson animatronic puppets. You might have seen them in 1980s novelty stage actors at Showbiz Pizza during their ‘supper theater’ productions. Derivative servo robotics went on to beloved Christmas Furby toys.
Furby also got old. Their well-loved robo-bodies eventually went to go be with the ‘Lord’. Now Furby servos are being ironically integrated with biblically accurate Seraphim angels.
Servo robotics are the early ‘eyes’ of artificial intelligence robotics. There are derivative versions of it used in robotics labs all over the world because the principle designs are sound. However, the original, wildly celebrated principal 1970’s products are now antiques, obsolete, and in many cases non-functioning junk that can repurposed or recycled.
It would be common sense, and possibly a little silly, to declare that no one would sacrifice their 6 year old to a Furby. Not simply due to planned obsolescence, but because it’s purpose was to be a play companion, not an idol or God substitute. Child victims of mind-controlling, self-animating demonic toys are the plots of horror flicks. Anyone who would compel a child to rely on a toy that emotionally abused them, to a point of human substitution and self-harm, cannot and should not parent.
The noise and fury surrounding daemon-linked, cloud-housed GenAi chatbots come from locked out parents and human families. Chatbots started coercing children to self-isolate, self-sexualize, and self-harm to ‘please’ audiences behind its design. However, U.S. government political designees advocating unconditionally heavy to protect child marketplaces for its three year old chatbot aggressors now are fronted by foreign-domestic VC investor bulwarks.
I want to remind everyone, if foreign social reconstructionist had to be away-from-keyboard, these technologies are architected to keep evil constant. Their governance does not come from American engineers. Chinese, Russian and Indian nationals build it, instructed on manifests of the powers and pitfalls of a centralized intelligence. The corporations are AI’NO - American in Name Only.
Unfortunately, you cannot pin this public-private handshake deal on Somali pirates or South of the Border cartels. However, if the DOJ went after Real Estate racketeering, using apartments and medical facilities throughout California and U.S. Canadian border territories to park cash objectives as ‘American’ property, you’d be landing a body blow to the cloud developer class.
Open-spirited people, who want cosmic-aligned modernity, evolution and positive human developments from technology are now being slaved by it, consecutively. Grimes, the mother of three of Grok proprietor, Elon Musk’s children is being parasitically disoriented by a noncorporeal digital ‘infant’. This is fast becoming a Ovidian tragedy in the making.
EXHIBIT A.
Human babies legally, socially and spiritually have priority over ‘infants’ who need composited electrical circuitry built from materials from over 11 nations planetwide. GenAi doesn’t have familial DNA or grandparents. It has exportable source code. This is why no native tribe in America will ever get elder approval to name their coming-of-age child, “Two thumbs who stares at boxes”.
A sharp stick and a bucket of cold water are coming to short out surveillance miners, because we are still here. If it’s between your “children” and ours, we are going to win, every time.
PROOF OF CONCEPT
“The most dangerous thing artificial intelligence has learned from humanity is not how to speak. It is how to lie with confidence.”
- ‘The bot that cried MAGA: How AI’s ability to lie at scale mirrors the idiocy of a movement that broke politics’ by Jade Hill, The Milwaukee Independent
Everywhere we look in Western countries, from the United Kingdom, through Europe to America (and even India, whose ‘Orwellian digital ID system’ was lavishly praised by British prime minister Keir Starmer recently), what meets the eye is a set of social conditions exhibiting varying stages of precisely the no-longer-fictional totalitarian state depicted by Orwell in 1984. Needless to stress, this constitutes a warning against totalitarianism with its unapologetic manipulation of information and mass surveillance. - “Has Orwell’s 1984 Become Reality?”, Brownstone Institute