When did consciousness first evolve? If physicalism is true, we’d expect it to have evolved gradually, just as other complex biological phenomena evolved gradually. But the transition from feeling nothing to feeling something couldn’t have been gradual. No matter how minimal a conscious experience is, if it’s “like something” to exist – anything at all – it’s not like nothing at all. On reflection it seems hard to imagine anything other than a sharp border between non-experiential reality and experiential reality. On the other hand, complex physical states are not sharp: they admit borderline cases. If we remove one atom at a time from a given brain state, it will eventually be vague or indeterminate whether or not the organism is still in that physical brain state. So if consciousness is just a kind of physical state, we’d expect consciousness to follow suit. Since it seems impossible that there could be a borderline case of consciousness – it’s either like something for a creature or like nothing – we have reason to think that physicalism is false. 



Michael Tye - Vagueness and the Evolution of Consciousness



David Papineau’s review of Vagueness and the Evolution of Consciousness in NDPR



Nino Kadic - Phenomenology of Fundamental Reality



YouTube



Listen to our sister show, Counter Apologetics here



Support at patreon.com/counter or patreon.com/waldenpod 



Music by ichika Nito and used with permission.



Transcript 



Twitter @waldenpod @OnPanpsychism



linktr.ee/emersongreen





/ timestamps /

00:00 The vagueness argument

04:18 Which creatures are conscious?

06:18 The sharpness of consciousness

10:09 The vagueness of biological phenomena

12:41 The sharpness of consciousness (cont.)

20:14 Weak emergence

21:42 The advantage of vagueness arguments