Listen

Description

Program Integrity and Institutional Quality Committee: A Focus on Distance Education and the Return of Title IV Funds.

In this episode, host Drumm McNaughton is joined by Tom Netting, president of 10 Government Strategies, to discuss the recent Neg Reg 2024 proceedings and their implications for higher education institutions. They explore the key issues addressed during the negotiations, including distance education, accreditation, cash management, and more. The discussion highlights the importance of staying informed and engaged in the regulatory process to ensure the best outcomes for students and institutions alike.

 

Key Discussion Points

Neg Reg 2024 March Consensus: One Out of Six

The Issue Where Consensus Was Achieved

The Five Issues Where Consensus Was Not Achieved

  1. Cash management
  2. State authorization
  3. Distance education
  4. Return to Title IV funds
  5. Accreditation and a complete rewrite of all accreditation

Why is Neg Reg Important to Presidents, Boards, and Executive Levels of Higher Ed?

Semantics Matter: Pay Close Attention to Neg Reg Revisions

Clarity Around Consensus, Non-Consensus, and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

Major Points from Neg Reg March 2024:

Distance Education, Accreditation, NC-SARA, and Cash Management

Accreditation: Rewriting Part 602

Cash Management, Tuition and Fees, Books and Supplies

Why Higher Ed Leaders Need to Stay Involved in Neg Reg

What's Happening on The Hill

The 100 Percent Rule: Certifications and Licensures

Title IX Revisions

 

Key March 2024 Neg Reg Takeaways for Higher Ed Leaders

Higher education leaders should be prepared to advocate for their institutions and students, both on Capitol Hill and in response to Notices of Proposed Rulemaking. The issues discussed during Neg Reg 2024 will have significant implications for financial aid, IT departments, and other aspects of institutional operations.

Final Thoughts

 The Neg Reg 2024 proceedings have highlighted the complex and often contentious nature of higher education regulation. As the Department of Education continues to push for increased consumer protection and oversight, it is more important than ever for higher education leaders to stay engaged in the process and advocate for their institutions' and students' needs. By working together and providing thoughtful input during public comment periods, the higher education community can help shape regulations that support student success and institutional sustainability in the face of evolving challenges and opportunities.

 

Read the transcript on our website →

 

About Our Podcast Guest

Tom Netting

Having spent all of his professional career devoted to higher education policy oversight and implementation, Tom Netting has an extensive knowledge of the laws and regulations governing all aspects of higher education. His considerable background and experience have afforded him the opportunity to view the development and implementation of federal higher education and workforce development policy in their entirety – including issues related to higher education and workforce development, health care, veteran affairs policies, and the procurement of federal appropriations.

 

About the Host

Dr. Drumm McNaughton is a consultant to higher education institutions in governance, accreditation, strategy and change, and mergers. To learn more about his services and other thought leadership pieces, visit his firm’s website: https://changinghighered.com/.

 

 The Change Leader’s Social Media Links

#NegReg2024 #HigherEducation #WashingtonUpdate