Listen

Description

Episode 163 emphasizes that effective safety leadership requires prioritizing hazards by the harm they can cause, not by how often they occur. Dr. Ayers explains that many organizations focus on frequency and ignore severity, which leads to underestimating high‑consequence hazards that may be rare but catastrophic. Leaders must understand the equipment deeply enough to rank hazards by worst‑case outcomes and control them accordingly.


 
🔑 Key Takeaways
1. Severity Must Drive Hazard Prioritization

Leaders often focus on:

Meanwhile, they overlook hazards that could cause:

Severity is the true measure of risk.


 
2. Equipment Hazards Are Often Misunderstood

Dr. Ayers stresses that leaders must understand:

You can’t prioritize hazards you don’t understand.


 
3. Rare but Catastrophic Hazards Are the Most Dangerous

Just because something “hasn’t happened” doesn’t mean it can’t. Leaders must consider:

Low‑frequency does not equal low‑risk.


 
4. Workers Often Normalize High‑Severity Hazards

Because they see the equipment every day, workers may:

Leaders must break this normalization.


 
5. Controls Must Match the Severity of the Hazard

High‑severity hazards require:

Administrative controls alone are not enough.


 
6. Leaders Must Ask Better Questions

Dr. Ayers encourages leaders to ask:

These questions reveal the true risk profile.


 
🧩 Big Message

Episode 163 reinforces that risk is defined by severity, not frequency. Leaders must understand equipment hazards deeply, evaluate worst‑case consequences, and prioritize controls accordingly. When leaders focus only on what happens often, they miss what could hurt people the most.