Season 7 continues with another presentation from our 2022 annual conference, Engaged Phenomenology II: Explorations of Embodiment, Emotions, and Spatiality.
This episode features a presentation from Sepehr Razavi of University of Edinburgh, UK
Abstract:
A breakthrough conceptual distinction in the interdisciplinary research on self-conscious emotions concerns the difference between shame and guilt: whereas guilt concerns circumscribed deeds, shame is a negative evaluation of the self as a whole (Lewis 1971; Tangney 2002; Cavell 2003). This has drawn the interest of classical phenomenologists from Scheler, Levinas, and Sartre to more contemporary ones such as Felipe León, Dan Zahavi, and Luna Dolezal insofar as this distinction grounds a robust understanding of the self. Although disagreements emerge at the level of assessing the degree of social mediation involved in shame and whether the “ugly feeling” can lead to self-improvement (Tangney and Dearing 2004, 3, 55; Deonna, Rodogno, and Teroni 2012, 35), shame’s reflexive function in face-to-face and social encounters has been stressed by the phenomenological tradition. However, an instance of shame that has been far less studied within this tradition, especially in light of a reflexive dimension, is in shame as the triadic object of collective intentionality. As a case study, I will elaborate on the national shame following the Truth and Reconciliation Commission reports on the state violence towards Canada’s indigenous population in “residential schools.” What will transpire is that empirical testimonies show ambiguity and cross-contamination where research had tried to neatly delineate between emotions of a common semantic field that includes embarrassment, denial, shame, and guilt, among other negative emotions (Regan 2011, 55). However, these mixed emotions are demonstrative of a process of narrative identity that ties the non-native population of Canada as standing opposed to first nation communities.
Biography:
Sepehr Razavi is an MSc student in Mind, Language and Embodied Cognition at the University of Edinburgh. Using the frameworks of classical and contemporary phenomenology and the cognitive sciences, he is interested in the concept of normality as it relates to research on emotions and pathologies.
Further Information:
This recording is taken from our Annual UK Conference 2022: Engaged Phenomenology II: Explorations of Embodiment, Emotions, and Sociality (Exeter, UK / Hybrid) with the University of Exeter. Sponsored by the Wellcome Centre, Egenis, and the Shame and Medicine project. For the conference our speakers either presented in person at Exeter or remotely to people online and in-room, and the podcast episodes are recorded from the live broadcast feeds.
The British Society for Phenomenology is a not-for-profit organisation set up with the intention of promoting research and awareness in the field of Phenomenology and other cognate arms of philosophical thought. Currently, the society accomplishes these aims through its journal, events, and podcast.
About our events: https://www.thebsp.org.uk/events/
About the BSP: https://www.thebsp.org.uk/about/
