Description

In this episode, we continue our discussion of disagreement in science, shifting the conversation from why it matters to how to do it well.

Shownotes

• Paul Graham. (2008). How to disagree. 
• Rapoport's Rules. 
  • Cass Sunstien. The Rapoport Rules.
• Preregistration is redundant, at best. 
• An Evidence-Based Critique of the Cass Review 

• Fiedler, K., Messner, C., & Bluemke, M. (2006). Unresolved problems with the “I”, the “A”, and the “T”: A logical and psychometric critique of the Implicit Association Test (IAT). European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 74–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280600681248

• Neyman, J. (1961). Silver Jubilee of My Dispute With Fisher. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 3, 145–154.