Description

Key Themes and Ideas:

1. The Prevalence of Bullshit:

• Frankfurt begins by asserting that bullshit is a widespread phenomenon in contemporary culture. "One of the most salient features of our culture is that there is so much bullshit. Everyone knows this. Each of us contributes his share."
• He notes that despite its ubiquity, there has been little serious study of bullshit. We tend to take it for granted and often believe we are good at recognizing it.
• This lack of inquiry means that we have no clear understanding of what bullshit is, why it's so prevalent, and its impact. "In consequence, we have no clear understanding of what bullshit is, why there is so much of it, or what functions it serves. And we lack a conscientiously developed appreciation of what it means to us."

2. Defining Bullshit and its Distinction from Lying:

• Frankfurt argues that bullshit is distinct from lying, not simply a less serious form of it. The key difference is the bullshitter's relationship to truth.
• Lying: The liar is concerned with the truth, even if their aim is to deceive. They must believe something is false in order to assert the opposite. "In order to invent a lie at all, he must think he knows what is true. And in order to invent an effective lie, he must design his falsehood under the guidance of that truth." They are on the opposite side of truth, but still in relation to it.
• Bullshitting: The bullshitter doesn't care about truth or falsity; their primary concern is to achieve their own aim. They might present a falsehood or truth or anything in between, but it's all done without concern for accuracy. "For the bullshitter, however, all these bets are off: he is neither on the side of the true nor on the side of the false. His eye is not on the facts at all, as the eyes of the honest man and of the liar are, except insofar as they may be pertinent to his interest in getting away with what he says."
• The Bullshitter's Focus: "What he does necessarily attempt to deceive us about is his enterprise. His only indispensably distinctive characteristic is that in a certain way he misrepresents what he is up to."
• Analogy to fakery: Frankfurt argues that bullshit is like a fake. "For the essence of bullshit is not that it is false but that it is phony. ... What is not genuine need not also be defective in some other way. It may be, after all, an exact copy. What is wrong with a counterfeit is not what it is like, but how it was made." The issue is not the content's accuracy, but the manner in which it was produced.

3. Bull Sessions and Other Forms of Bull:

• Frankfurt discusses "bull sessions" where people engage in conversation where the usual assumptions about truth and belief are suspended. The point is less about accurate reporting and more about "trying out various thoughts and attitudes." These sessions are "not for real" in terms of truth commitment.
• He examines the use of "bull" to refer to "unnecessary routine tasks or ceremonial" noting that they, like bullshit, are "disconnected from the legitimating motives of the activity upon which they intrude."
• He unpacks the link between bullshit and "hot air," where speech is "empty, without substance or content" and does not serve the purpose of communication.

4. The Greater Danger of Bullshit than Lying:

• Frankfurt argues that bullshit is a greater enemy of truth than lies because the bullshitter does not even acknowledge the authority of truth. "He does not reject the authority of the truth, as the liar does, and oppose himself to it. He pays no attention to it at all."
• He notes that the act of lying requires a respect for truth to exist - the liar must know the truth in order to turn away from it. The bullshitter's complete disregard for truth is more corrosive.

5. Why So Much Bullshit?

• Frankfurt suggests that bullshit is prevalent because people often feel obligated to speak on topics they know little about, or when they are pressured to have opinions on everything, a phenomenon especially common in democratic societies.
• He also identifies a deeper cause: skeptical views that reject the possibility of accessing objective reality. This has led some people to prioritize sincerity and "being true to one's self" over the pursuit of truth. However, Frankfurt points out that even our understanding of ourselves is not always solid or reliable.

欢迎大家留言分享你的感想，或者加艾薇同学的微信加入我们的听友群参与讨论～