In this episode of The Reaching Max Potential Podcast, we explore the relevance of Dunbar's Number, which suggests a cognitive limit to the number of people with whom we can maintain stable social relationships. Learn how understanding this concept can enhance your personal and professional life by helping you prioritize meaningful connections, improve team dynamics, and build cohesive communities. Discover practical tips for leveraging Dunbar's insights to optimize your social interactions and achieve your full potential.
REFERENCES
Carron, A. V., Hausenblas, H. A., & Mack, D. (1996). Social influence and exercise: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(1), 1-16.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1992). Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 20(6), 469-493.
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group size and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(4), 681-694.
Gladwell, M. (2000). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Little, Brown.
Gonçalves, B., Perra, N., & Vespignani, A. (2011). Modeling users' activity on Twitter networks: Validation of Dunbar's number. PloS one, 6(8), e22656.
Holt-Lunstad, J., Smith, T. B., & Layton, J. B. (2010). Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLOS Medicine, 7(7), e1000316.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
Roberts, S. G., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2011). The costs of family and friends: An 18-month longitudinal study of relationship maintenance and decay. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(3), 186-197.
Uzzi, B., & Dunlap, S. (2005). How to build your network. Harvard Business Review, 83(12), 53-60.
Wellman, B., & Hampton, K. (1999). Living networked on and offline. Contemporary Sociology, 28(6), 648-654.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.