Bryan Kohberger, the suspect in the November 2022 murders of four University of Idaho students (Madison Mogen, Kaylee Goncalves, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin), is facing four counts of murder and potentially the death penalty if convicted. Kohberger's defense team is employing a 'kitchen sink approach' to avoid a possible death sentence. This involves presenting a wide range of arguments, even if they are unlikely to succeed at the trial level, in order to preserve them for potential appeals.
Kohberger's defense argues that the firing squad method of execution is a 'cruel and unusual punishment,' although Idaho's current method of execution is lethal injection. The defense also suggests that the anxiety and fear caused by the uncertainty of how long Kohberger might be on death row is unconstitutional. Public defender Ann Taylor argued that if Kohberger is convicted, the jury rather than the judge should decide on the death sentence.
According to Neama Rahmani, a former federal prosecutor, the defense is taking this broad approach because it is statistically more likely to get a death sentence overturned on appeal. The defense is raising 'Hail Mary-type arguments' that are unlikely to be accepted by the trial judge but could potentially be accepted by appellate judges, thus saving Kohberger's life in the long run.
The case is significant due to the brutal nature of the killings and the extensive DNA evidence, including a knife sheath found at the scene, which investigators used to tie Kohberger to the crimes
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
