In this episode we do a deep dive on one of the dumbest, most mind-bending, time-consuming arguments made by Karkowsky's lawyer during pretrial motions: The question of whether or not to allow Karkowsky to introduce a full copy of his forged transcript as evidence. But it was forged, you may ask? Shouldn't that preclude it from being held forth as an authentic piece of evidence? Nevertheless his lawyer persisted.
If you haven't listened to parts one and two of this series, please listen to those first.
To learn more about ZA'AKAH or to donate, visit our website at https://zaakah.org
To get in touch with questions, comments, or any other concerns related to Outcry, email us at podcast@zaakah.org
Follow us on our socials to stay informed:
Facebook: https://facebook.com/zaakah
Twitter: @zaakahny
Instagram: @zaakahig
TikTok: @zaakahny
WhatsApp Group: https://chat.whatsapp.com/J9HgXsOlZPhHhqsj6s7HBa
WhatsApp Channel: https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029VayGPAG59PwPAc6jzL2B
