Episode Overview: In today’s episode, we’re diving deep into one of the most common hiring practices: the job interview. Is it the best way to decide who to hire, or is it time for a change? We’ll explore the history of interviews, their effectiveness, and why they might not always be the best tool for hiring decisions.
Key Topics:
- The Interview Process
We discuss the most widely used interview types today—behavioral and lightly structured interviews—and whether they’re as effective as we think they are. - The Historical Context
Where did interviews come from? How did they evolve post-WW2 and through the rise of technology-driven recruitment? - Are Interviews Effective?
We’ll look at the validity of interviews, citing studies like Schmidt and Hunter’s 1998 research that show a 0.44 validity. We’ll also explore how interviews empower hiring managers, foster trust in the process, and offer a “universal” system. - Who Succeeds in Interviews?
It turns out interviews might not be as objective as we’d like to think. Traits like extroversion, articulate speech, and likability (often tied to appearance and confidence) can give candidates an unfair advantage, thanks to confirmation bias. - The Typical Interview Questions
From asking about weaknesses (where most candidates humble-brag) to questions like “Where do you see yourself in 5 years?”—we dig into why these questions are asked, and whether they’re actually helping us make better hiring decisions. - The Pitfalls of Interviews
Why can’t we compare candidates effectively? We talk about how bias, ‘fit,’ and likeability play a larger role in hiring decisions than they should, and how untrained interviewers tend to “wing it.” - What’s the Solution?
Could mandatory interviewer training, structured interviews with standard questions, or even work tests be better alternatives? We explore these options and the pros and cons of each. - The Bottom Line
Is the traditional interview process outdated? Should we be looking for a new way to hire talent, or is the interview here to stay?
Takeaways:
- Interviews may not be the most objective way to hire, but they remain a widely accepted practice.
- Bias, overconfidence, and lack of interviewer training are all factors that undermine the effectiveness of interviews.
- Structured interviews, training for interviewers, and skill assessments could be potential solutions to make the hiring process more fair and accurate.
Is This Idea Worth Binning?
We wrap up by asking whether it’s time to throw the traditional interview process out the window—or if it’s still worth keeping.
Listen Now: Don't miss this thought-provoking conversation on rethinking the hiring process. Tune in for insights on how to make hiring decisions better and more efficient!
If you have any Dedx suggestions email us at team@samsas.one with the subject line Dedx Idea.
We would love to hear them!
John: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jadm/
Anna: https://www.linkedin.com/in/anna-wesson-54989929/
Music credit: by Yevhen Onoychenko from Pixabay
Disclaimer: The ideas discussed in this podcast are intended for entertainment purposes only and should not be taken as serious business advice. Listeners are encouraged to do their own research and seek professional advice before implementing any of the ideas discussed.
