Description

Send me a message.

This is part 3 of my history of D&T. 

Some questions for you to think about:

• In your context, who has the power, urgency and legitimacy to influence or change the value, purpose and nature of D&T education?
• If you don't have all 3 of these characteristics (power, urgency and legitimacy), who do you need to collaborate with?
• How are you sharing your D&T practitioner research with the wider education community?
• Who do you think has the power, urgency and legitimacy at national (macro), local (meso) and classroom (micro) level?

Episode transcript

Mentioned in this episode

Williams, P.J., 2007. Stakeholders in Technology Education. In: D. VRIES Marc J., R. CUSTER, and J.R. DAKERS, eds., Analyzing best practices in technology education. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers, pp. 179-190.

Hardy, A.L., 2017. Rhetoric and Interpretation: The Values Students and Special Interest Groups Attribute to Design & Technology. In: PATT34 (2017), July 10-14, 2017. Philadelphia: Millersville University, pp. 203-211.

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Twitter@hardy_alison or by emailing me.

Support the show

If you like the podcast, you can always buy me a coffee to say 'thanks!'

Please offer your feedback about the show or ideas for future episodes and topics by connecting with me on Threads @hardy_alison or by emailing me.

If you listen to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, please take a moment to rate and/or review the show.

If you want to support me by becoming a Patron click here.

If you are not able to support me financially, please consider leaving a review on Apple Podcasts or sharing a link to my work on social media. Thank you!