BONUS EP: Custodial Evaluators
In this bonus episode of the JudgMental Podcast, Christine and Hugh dive into the latest developments in Louisville, Kentucky’s family court system—specifically, the controversy surrounding custodial evaluations. They discuss recent motions to disqualify commonly used evaluators, the issues of confirmation bias, testing fatigue, and the problematic “team approach” to psychological testing.
The hosts break down the findings from a Florida expert’s report, including concerns about the use of certain psychological tests, the misuse of “forensic” terminology, and the troubling confidentiality practices that leave families in the dark. They also explore the broader implications for families caught in the system, the delays and high costs of evaluations, and the impact on children and parents.
Listeners will hear real stories from the community, learn about similar cases in California, and get practical advice on what to look for in billing and evaluation reports. Christine invites anyone with experiences involving evaluators Marvin, McCreary, or Burley to share their stories and bills for further investigation.
Key topics:
Motions to disqualify evaluators in Louisville
Confirmation bias and testing issues in custodial evaluations
The “team approach” and lack of transparency
Confidentiality concerns and public record implications
Delays, costs, and the impact on families
National patterns and high-profile cases
How to submit your own stories and reports
Connect with us:
Website: judge-y.com
Christine: @Kentuckychristine (all platforms)
Podcast: Judge-y (YouTube, Instagram, TikTok)
Tune in for a candid, eye-opening discussion on the realities of family court evaluations and what needs to change.
